Moral Objectivity

Even with a materialistic world, you can derive concrete values and morality. That's the scary part.

God's not this ultimate being, that gives everything definition, that without we cannot have it. 

It's like, you either know Him or you don't. Obviously, God exists because there is Good. Like, you can say "Good" doesn't exist apart from God. But, that's not to say that you can't qualify "Good" as "Beneficial" as in something that supplies emotional and physical needs. And when science does quantify that, it's going to be dangerous. Because obviously, what produces the most sound and beneficial society is the Old Testament. It's going to be confronted with the absolute depravity of man, and then possibly go one of two directions, or maybe both. It's going to understand that humans are depraved, and cannot sustain that perfect system, therefore it will make lawlessness. Or it will take it upon itself to force us into that Law. Which, either would be catastrophic, and probably hellish to live in.

Morality is very real. You can justify it with science. Because obviously love hormones create better looking and stronger people, and what creates love hormones is general piety and conservative values. That's just a fact, you can see it as plainly in Horace as you can Confucius. It's the fact that the argument is so stupid, that it's left Atheists dazzled by it, and Christians seem like they only know right from wrong because God tells them so.

Which, man has a conscience, and inherently understands God's law innately. That's what separates us from the beast. And if God exists, that conscience ought to be satisfied by evidence in the real world. And when they find that evidence, that's going to be a game changer, and it's going to create havoc. Because man won't know what to do with it, apart from God.