Response to Rationality Rules on Frank Turek

But that's atheist's fault, for framing the argument like that. Hume was the only one of you guys who ever came close to having a moral argument, and his was woeful. So, the apologists are right. 

I mean, personally, I think if you find a universal ethics, you find proof of Christianity, and I think ethics are perfectly observed phenomena. But, it's not "Because God, therefore Ethics," but "Ethics, therefore God." It's always backward with all of you. But that's been the argument since Nietzsche and Kant. I think, rather, what we observe about ethics, proves Christianity is right. Not Christianity proves ethics right. 

As what's compelling about Christ is how right He is, being also an uneducated Peasant from Galilee. So well learned, and never being educated, you have to wonder about Him, that maybe He is God. I studied for 30 years. Jesus came out of the gate knowing things that I can't even hold a candle too, and still learn today. And He was never schooled.