Postmodernism

At best, Postmodernism is like working in a different base number system, than Base 10, and then working tirelessly to tweak Base 10 equations to fit the number theory into this new base system. Not only does it overcomplicate the simple matters of truth, but it also works out wrong answers more frequently than the right ones.

Also, realize, humanity is primed for Base 10 math, as we have ten fingers and ten toes. As it's the natural way our counting is done, and I see no more natural thing, than to derive a species of number system based on that. So also Postmodernism is doubly flawed, by trying to conform Logos into a framework that isn't especially intuitive to humans.

As a computer programmer, one uses Base 2. So 1 +1 = 3 (10) in this system. Yet that's fundamentally different than Base 10, 1 + 1 = 2. As you can see, an entirely different language is presented in both, like it were Russian and English. But the fundamental science is still the same in both, but the number fundamentally different. As with moral truths, there is science to it constructed around Language and Interpretation, of which the Postmodernist retranslates and reinterprets everything over and over again, until nothing makes sense, but the native speaker plainly speaks.

Leave a comment