That is like a pythagorean theorem, but I don't think a+b=c is the same as a^n+b^n=c^n. Basic algebra shows that you can't transpose exponents through addition. You can through multiplication, but they need to retain the same coefficient. You did create something like a pythagorean theorem, but in things like Heron's Formula, you see how when you multiply the numbers, it becomes different, and stops working. So, I think it's basic algebra to say that those two equations are different, and can't have the same number theory applied to them. Just because of how exponents work.
I also think to derive formulas, you have to do them through observing structures. A math formula is like a sentence. It describes a shape of some kind--which is why we use them in science--so I think the logic of a^n+b^n=c^n where n equals 2 is describing a specific pattern, where we discovered it through looking at a square. What a^3+b^3=c^3 would be, we don't know, but the logic is still valid, but it describes a specific shape. That's all our formulas are doing.
Mark 13:51Jesus saith unto them, Have ye understood all these things? They say unto him, Yea, Lord. 52Then said he unto them, Therefore every scribe which is instructed unto the kingdom of heaven is like unto a man that is an householder, which bringeth forth out of his treasure things new and old.
View all posts by B. K. Neifert