Or... you can just have a symbolic decade in 3193 where you celebrate its completion, and do a program on the history of that 1200 years. As the last year can be a sort of resting year, where you celebrate history, and see the thing as a time capsule. If this can actually get completed, that'd be extremely impressive. 1200 years would bring us back to the time of Cuchulain and Arthur. If humans could achieve this feat of patience, even pushing past the existence of entire empires--there's no saying Germany will be a thing 1200 years from now--that'd be impressive and a feat for all mankind. Especially without change to the design.
Author: B. K. Neifert
Mark 13:51Jesus saith unto them, Have ye understood all these things? They say unto him, Yea, Lord. 52Then said he unto them, Therefore every scribe which is instructed unto the kingdom of heaven is like unto a man that is an householder, which bringeth forth out of his treasure things new and old.
On Inventions by Black Americans
Well they were inventions created by black Americans. Everything's cumulative. They weren't the first, nor were they the last to make improvements, but they made their contributions.
It's like, many of our richest ideas are built upon over many years. What's important is that the inventor/creator gets compensated for their work. As that's why there's patent and copyright.
What distinguishes a true inventor/creator from a fraud, is it's their original idea. They witnessed it, and created it through their own design. By measure of human communication and what's possible, there's going to be similar ideas and inventions. Like Fairyland has reminiscent aspects of William Blake, and The Fifth Angel's Trumpet is a lot like Heinlein's Starship Troopers, since it was based on the movie, and it kind of developed in the same vein as the book--albeit unintentionally.
Like, Star Wars, Dune and Foundation are all practically the same story. It's just different iterations, which is fine. That's how we ought to work. You can retell a story over and over again, and add in new layers of nuance and detail. Like the Song of Songs archetype is the story of every lifetime and Rom Com, but it's different every time, based on the characterizations and nuances of the plot. Same thing with the Western and Romance. What's important, is that the author--if they're original--or the inventor--if they're original--get paid for their work. As if they don't, that's when the system is failing.
True creation is mimeses, not mimicry. It draws from primary sources (nature and form), and not secondary or tertiary sources (copying and plagiarism). Or quaternary, (outright theft).
A Sermon to the Antichrist
Devil, you need God's power to be good. We know right from wrong innately. That's not what God is for. Abraham had to be shown God does not demand human sacrifice, as the Amorite Religion required it. Except once, through God's Son, which God says Jehovah Jireh. He will provide. But our conscience bears witness to that, and the Bible bears witness to our conscience.
Slavery is a kindness on those who cannot understand or know how to take care of themselves. Or it's there to reprove the wicked for their crimes. It also was the only way to keep large cities fed. We don't need it now, as we have industrial machinery.
God talks more about charity than anything else. That's why I believe.
The wars God caused man to fight brought peace, though. Sin grows too severe sometimes, where the next time, God will have to destroy it Himself, like He did in Noah's day. But in Moses' day, He delivered the people of Israel through the beach, and defeated Pharaoh, and caused the next generation to war with Canaan, as they were in deep sin, which caused deep suffering. In Christ's day, He died and raised, and persuaded the entire Roman empire, through the peace of His servants' righteousness. But now, we cannot war anymore. We have to win through persuasion. Like it were in Rome, again, and maybe by our own blood.
We don't know who burns in hell. God is Judge not I. No, I don't know who's going to hell. Or who's going to heaven. Nobody does. The nations will join themselves with Israel, so there's no way to tell. God's Word is extolled above even Himself, so those who love righteousness, I believe have grace, so long as they find Christ, and His power. There is one name, and all other roads are wicked. There is only one gate, but few shall find it. I believe righteousness compels the LORD to find you, though, and move all things to bring you to Him, and gather you, as a Hen does its flock.
But He resurrected, confirming His witness. Josephus names His brother, James, dying for the testimony that Christ raised from the dead. Not to mention, myriads of Church history--we know a lot about the apostles--they died believing too, having met and ate, and lived a very intimate and close life with Him. And they saw Him ascend. And Thomas put His hands into His wounds, being slain by red hot irons after not perishing in a furnace. So it could only be Christ. That's confirmation of His moral teachings.
The Gospels are the evidence. They're more reliable and closer to the source than Plutarch. And we have far more manuscripts to compare and understand, and make a complete documentation of the scripture. We know this through Papias who it was who wrote the Gospels of Mark, Matthew and John, and Luke we know accompanied Paul, who knew James, Peter, John and through John Mary.
Well, consider, if you weren't going to hell, the LORD would draw you to Himself. You couldn't be removed even if Satan employed Seraphim to blaspheme God's holiness through your prophetic organs. Which Satan has done, as I've witnessed through reading about the martyrs. If the LORD has chosen you, He knows your heart already, and will save you because He has instilled His righteousness within your heart, and has proved you love His law. There is no work, but a change of heart. The LORD is sovereign, and is the one Who causes change.
It's not your deeds, but your state of heart. Hell happens because you've rejected the Holy Spirit, and cannot have a share of God's righteousness, nor His peace. If you cannot have God's peace, where will you go? What will you have? God is the source of all good. So you ultimately can have no good if you choose to reject Him.
There's no work in heaven. It's a restoration of Eden, with Hephzibah as your Eve or for women the LORD as their Husband, and the Lord's Mind, Soul and Spirit so you can never have any more sin. You become like God, and have power to judge, and are made into clans and nations. It's the restoration of the mistake made by Adam and Eve, only saved through Christ, and given a resurrected form like Himself.
Jesus and Infinity
[I]nfinity is a difficult concept. Like, calculus assumes an infinite to divide and get a correct solution--which is a lot like how I understand faith to be.
Like, it's just so hard for people to understand. You can have infinites in one dimension, that are smaller than infinites in two, which are smaller than infinites in three... and so forth. I think everyone should take a basic Algebra class, to understand that stuff.
But, why we know Christ is LORD, is what He spoke. I learned for 30 years--since I was 5--and was in intensive education, first in school and then on my own. Jesus had none of that. He was from Galilee, poorer than you know. We have houses unearthed in Galilee, they'd be the size of my living room. The Psalmist says He had no bed, and was thrown out of His house. He was homeless... and kind of struggling mentally with that, too. You see He's stressed out in His ministry, but He always keeps composure. He's not Schizophrenic at all. I am... but He's not. He's fully cognizant and in a time without medications, so His condition could only get worse and not better if He were crazy. And nothing shows that He was. Not anything we've seen about Him. And He was just an extremely gifted human being. Fully salient, fully in His right mind, and performing miracles. Jesus is the Son of God, for those reasons.
Response to Rationality Rules on Frank Turek
But that's atheist's fault, for framing the argument like that. Hume was the only one of you guys who ever came close to having a moral argument, and his was woeful. So, the apologists are right.
I mean, personally, I think if you find a universal ethics, you find proof of Christianity, and I think ethics are perfectly observed phenomena. But, it's not "Because God, therefore Ethics," but "Ethics, therefore God." It's always backward with all of you. But that's been the argument since Nietzsche and Kant. I think, rather, what we observe about ethics, proves Christianity is right. Not Christianity proves ethics right.
As what's compelling about Christ is how right He is, being also an uneducated Peasant from Galilee. So well learned, and never being educated, you have to wonder about Him, that maybe He is God. I studied for 30 years. Jesus came out of the gate knowing things that I can't even hold a candle too, and still learn today. And He was never schooled.
YouTube Channels I Watch
Metatron
Kings and Generals
Jess of the Shire
Vlogbrothers
Crash Course
Mental Floss
Premath
Vsauce
Numberphile
The Daily Wire
Candace Owens
Brett Cooper
Pragur-U
Many Many Documentaries From Professional Film Mostly About Literary Figures
School of Life
Mind Your Decisions
Testify
Sean McDowell
Jordan Peterson
Amala Ekpunobi
Yale Courses Online
Bruce Gore
Mato Jelic
Veritasium
Minute Physics
Sci Show
Bri The Math Guy
Welch Labs
Many Videos on Anthropology (Videos on First Contact, and Stuff on Primitive Tribes Derived From Primary Sources)
Jenna Moreci
The Young Turks
Adam Conover
Genetically Modified Skeptic
ZOMGitsCriss
Alex O'Connor
Rationality Rules
Society of Gilbert Keith Chesterton
Old Ted Talks
PBS
Tibees
Wes Huff
TabletClass Math
Mathologer
Vox
Ali the Dazzling
Stand-up Maths
Ink and Fantasy
Dr. Geoff Lindsey
Alternate History Hub
Warren Smith
Art Deco
Overly Sarcastic Productions
Many Online College Lectures Like from Biola or Texas A&M
Ants Canada
Cole Hastings
Writing with Andrew
Sprouts
Big Think
Jared Henderson
Socrates in the City
Math Visual Proofs
Unsolicited Advice
bprp Math Basics
Digital Genius
Psych2Go
Ruhi Çenet
Jubilee
Wrath of Math
Dr. Adam Walker - Close Reading Poetry
Tribal People Try
Fearless and Far
Thru the Bible
Vallis - Video Essays
Zero2Pi
David Packman Show
Philip DeFranco Show
Mathematical Visual Proofs
Ben Syversen
Tiny Aha Lens
The Second Story
Detormentis
Intelligence Squared
Graham Scheper
Art of the Problem
BeyondtheBlue
Insparaggio
Medieval Mindset
ThePhantomoftheMath
MyWildBackyard
David Hoffman
WATOP
Vintage American Rewind
Christian Content:
Wretched
Daily Disciple
Christian Sermons and Audio Books
C. S. Lewis Devotions
Truth Is Christ
Bible Alive
Biblical Bookworm
Matt Whitman and the Ten Minute Bible Hour
Mark Driscoll
Counsel of Trent
How to Faith A Life
PatristicNectarFilms
Redeemed Zoomer
Allie Beth Stuckey
Alisa Childers
Isaiah Saldivar
Got Questions Ministries
Christian Blue
Brian Holdsworth
Matt Powell OFFICIAL
Tack Room Bible Talk
Orthodox Teaching of the Elders
Sermon Jams
Whatdoyoumean
Lion of Fire Ministries
Fight for Truth
Living Waters
Red Pen Logic
Cross Examined
Taylor Alesia
Off the Curb Ministries
Bruce Gore Ministries
Bishop Robert Baron
Breaking the Habit
Mike Schmidt
Justin Peters
Ear to Hear
DinxthePuppet
Molly Ann Luna
Become New
Tolkien
I think Tolkien's whole spiel, is creating technology that harmonizes with nature, both human and the earth. He got that from William Blake, which I know for a fact, he had to have some contact with Jerusalem. As the two have nearly identical themes. Like that is the meaning of TLOTR, and Sauron is not Hitler, but unchecked industrialization. It's more the conflict of World War I and not actually World War II, which is why he always hated allegory.
But that could also be the fact that Industrialization was seen as something like a Plague in the English Conscience, from even the time of William Blake, and that theme arose organically in Tolkien's mind. That's always possible, too, as communication works that way.
Tolkien, for instance, got the Ring of Power from The Elder Edda, and so did Wagner, and that's why the two are so similar, and sometimes Tolkien is erroneously said to have been inspired by Wagner, when he really was inspired by Seamunder.
But I say World War I because he saw no man's land, and the beginnings of modern warfare. That was the first modern war, and it destroyed so much of the pastureland and green, and it was the result of industrialization frustrating people. You can see film of people right on the cusp of World War I in old Film Reels, how they're kind of lackadaisical, and don't understand how to navigate the streets right, and kind of dreamily go about their business in shock by all the new advancements of technology. That's the ring of power, is that corruptive influence of power and greed, combined with the destruction of the Earth through industrialization. Smoke chimneys creating black smog that would choke out entire communities; strip mines; bad civil engineering geared more toward what's practical than what's beautiful. Mr. Scrooge is more Sauron than Hitler. It's just that wasteful greed and mindless destruction.
The Foolish Philosopher
He was asked, "Put this square peg
"Into the round hole. It is impossible."
But, the philosopher did, jamming it
Into the hole, and getting it stuck.
The king was greatly impressed,
And couldn't remove the peg.
He said, "Well, this is how it will do
"Then, For this can never be removed."
For it got stuck. And trying to remove it
One day, the toy broke. It was good for nothing
But to be discarded in the trash.
Lo! Even being stuck, it could no longer
Be used for amusement, but was a broken
Toy, good for no joy or amusement, but only suffering.
The Three Christian Truths
No law shall condemn you, in Christ's Blood;
Therefore, live according to love and not selfish ritual.
On Isaiah Saldivar
I think this is what true Christianity looks like. I don't think he's boasting at all, but signaling what it means to genuinely repent. I deleted a ton of bootlegged songs--about 1000--I stopped playing violent video games, I stopped cussing for the most part--sometimes one slips--I stopped masterbating and watching porn--now the Lord gives me dreams which I don't like, but some have been prophetic, I guess my shadow has to be purged there, where it's lawful--I can't watch movies practically, unless they're utmost pure, like the Wizard of Oz. I did watch 8 Crazy Nights recently, and About Time. I hide my eyes at the nudity and fast forward through the sex scenes. I mean, I'm not hyper vigilant and so afraid to sin that I despair every time I do it... But I do think this is what it means to be saved. And also to have a charitable heart for giving, and showing kindness as it's not just about what you don't do, but also how you care about other people.
But some things I've stopped doing also--that many Christians do--is judging and prophesying and using spiritual curses. I think Christians do this, and it's akin to black magic, when you cast and heap judgment on people. You are taught to do this, by reading the Old Testament, but Christ frees us from that curse, and our job isn't to yoke believers or unbelievers to that curse, but unyoke them and yoke them to Christ.
True salvation is marked by not wanting to sin. Like, it hurts to do it, and you just don't want to. Also an unwillingness to use deception, or lie, and cheat and steal. And also self sacrifice, willing to risk yourself if it means helping someone else. And being open and vulnerable, as Christ was an Open Conservative.
So, I think Christians judge a lot, and condemn, and vilify, and especially are antagonistic against Creativity. Like, it's either "Holy of Holies" or "Profane." There's no Michelangelo or C. S. Lewis or Tolkien allowed anymore. William Blake is Anathema, and only the Bible exists to teach us. That's simply not true... you need to derive correct analysis of the Bible to help you interpret other people, but generally, you learn a lot from other people, and reflecting what they say through the Bible. And embracing when they might have a clear point.
Like I learn a lot from Emily Dickenson. About a stale faith, that tortured people with what it forbade, and didn't let people express their creativity or be a little bit different. That's just as bad as a faith that lets every conceivable thing happen, so long as it's not breaking the State's Law, it doesn't matter. The Bible is a higher law, reflected in the conscience. It's not a legality, but a reflection of man's natural state of Justice. And I think we can go a little overboard with it, which is why I think the Bible can be unproductive for some people's faith, and a hindrance to it.
But, Isaiah's faith is exemplary. I wouldn't fault him for trying to live righteously, or anyone for that matter. That's why we have the Bible in the first place.