Category: Uncategorized

Interesting URLS

https://www.jstor.org/stable/275162



http://dssenglishbible.com/psalms%2022.htm



https://zmin.org/hebrew-letter-meanings#%3A~%3Atext%3DThe%20origin%20of%20the%20Hebrew%2Cbeth%20did%20mean%20%E2%80%9Chouse%E2%80%9D.



https://heritagesciencejournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40494-023-00920-9



https://jbqnew.jewishbible.org/assets/Uploads/454/jbq_454_FriedmanAmenhotepzz.pdf

YouTube Comment

There's actually a long standing tradition in the church--from the time of Augustine--that the "Days" in Genesis weren't literal days. And if you follow the Biblical account of Genesis 1, it does resemble, perfectly, the order Evolution would have occurred. Just saying... you don't have to stop believing in God because of evolution. That's a cop out argument, and is weak sauce. It just means you didn't want to believe in the first place.

Oh boy... Greeks used to speculate on Evolution. It's a concept as far back as 500 bc, in Pre-Ionian Philosophy.

But, I mean, the idea that the universe is self sufficient is an idea even older than that. Just about every known era of philosophy in history, dealt with it at some level. I do believe, philosophers like Aristotle and Plato had refuted the idea of the Universe's self Autonomy a long time ago. As did Aquinas and Augustine. As did Pythagoras, even before Aristotle or Plato. Pythagoras saw God in the figures of Geometry, that there was a coherent sense in the universe, that could only be sufficed by a designer. Like it will blow your mind, but Set Theory and Geometry are perfectly aligned. The same logic which defines sets, can be defined in length, width and breadth in Geometry. That's some pretty interesting stuff, there... that it can happen like that. It's never been refuted, and can't be. You can even expand that concept to Chemistry, Physics and just about everything that can be described. The sense that the same logic can be used to describe anything, shows a design to the universe. Like, the principles of Addition, Subtraction, Division and Multiplication can be used to describe all that exists, if ordered in the right manner. That's what blows my mind. The Rational. And then the empirical is the number. The rational exists through the numbers and how they relate to one another. Reason is like a predicate, and empiricism like a subject or object. I digress.

Michelle John

To the depths of my soul,
Had I known...
You'd steal my seraphim.
I pleasantly muse,
And you still rage about a childhood
Ill, that for all truth,
Happened when I was not yet a man.
I suppose your Karma works
By theft, lies, deceit, slander
And cheating and swindling?
Yes... you spin your magic web
Of lies, stealing someone's poem
I know not whose...
Hieronymus Bosch,
And trips to heaven and hell...
Tell me... did you visit Jotunheim in a dream?
Did you go to heaven, or hell?
No... but you steal even that from me.
I forgive you... though...
Which is what you ought to have done me.
I hope you enjoy your world,
Which you have fought so hard for,
And have won by your own prowess.

I’m A Liar

"The led tablet at Ebal
"Was not hindered by the red tape
"Of academia. Therefore,
"We ought to ignore it
"And throw the lead off the team.
"Though, it clearly can be seen
"From the article the letters drawn,
"We will say it's like a rorschach test.

"The 24th Century Anomaly
"Coincides with the Flood Myths in China.
"We know it happened from Tree Rings
"In an ancient tree in Ireland.
"But that can't be evidence of the flood.
"Nor can the fact that the Neolithic Civilization
"Ceased existing at that exact time
"Give us good evidence for the same.
"Also, Adam and Eve are not in Chinese
"Mythology, despite a monument erected
"In their honor, around the second Millennium BC.

"The Egyptian Chariot Spoke
"Found off Neweibu Beach
"Doesn't exist... despite it existing
"A decade ago when you first heard about it.
"Buried, blacklisted, and now forgotten.
"It was never authenticated by a renowned
"Artefact dealer, nor was it dated to the 18th Egyptian Dynasty.
"No, you see, ships sank in that area many times
"And that explains why so many chariot pieces were scattered
"On the Seafloor.

"There were no Venuses found in the Americas
"And E. B. Renaud did not speculate
"On a universal Neolithic Religion
"Of a Mother Goddess,
"Which the Venuses were not found on the American Continents.
"No, this article was not taken off of JSTOR
"And the author you read is crazy,
"And no such citation ever existed.
"Nor does the Bible mention "Peleg"
"That the Earth divided in his days.
"I'm sure it does, but it doesn't mean what 
"Brandon says it does. Obviously...
"That'd be absurd.

"Papias was an idiot, and Erasmus even said so,
"And he was dead wrong when he told us
"Who wrote Mark and Matthew;
"And He didn't say he wrote the Book of John
"By John's the Elder's own word.
"Who is that John? It's not the Apostle John.
"And certainly, Luke was not a good historian,
"And he didn't get everything contemporary in his gospel.

"Also, Psalm 22 doesn't say 'My hands and feet are pierced'
"But rather it means 'Bit by a lion's tooth,' and the Dead Sea
"Scrolls don't say "Pierced.' And Psalm 2 doesn't say
"'Kiss the Son' No, it says, "Kiss the pure'
"The "Pure" Begotten by God. And the Bible is full of Anachronisms.
"Like David says the Walls need rebuilt, Moses says there will be a King
"And that there will be a curse, if the peoples sin,
"And Isaiah 53 clearly does not talk about a man's soul
"Being offered for the sin of the people. Not at all.
"And Zechariah doesn't say Joshua (The Hebrew form of Jesus)
"Will reign as both Priest and King, and forgive sins.
"That'd be absurd."

The Wet Nurse

There was a strange politics
In the days of old, when baby
Formula wasn't invented yet.
Many women couldn't breastfeed
So, they'd hire a dam to feed their babies.
Some wouldn't breastfeed because
Their class or status put it beneath them.
But the fact is, someone's teats
Were needed to nourish an infant.
Thank God for Baby Formula.

Curiously, someone made an argument
For abortion with this in mind...
I think without baby formula
It'd be compulsory to feed the infant
Any way you knew how...
Which, this politics was strange
Because if you can't, then you'd need
Another woman to do the service you couldn't.
This was the politics for nearly 6,000 years.