Just assume everything he says is a lie. He doesn't rub me the wrong way, he just lies. I mean, I can account for errors in all of his videos, but he's just telling you what's being taught in seminary--like everything he's telling you is what they teach in Seminary. That's what's truly scary, everything he says is something you'll learn in a College Textbook. And Academia lies about all of it. That's where the lies start, Dan is just telling you what they're teaching in places like Emory and Oxford.

They're also altering primary sources. So they make all this stuff true... it's brainwashing. Just know Jesus is coming soon. This is part of the Antichrist System, they want to alter the Word of God, the Traditions, put everything into doubt, just so Christians don't have a leg to stand on. And as Paul said, "All I know is Christ and Him Crucified," and I'd add "Him raised."

You really can't defend the faith when Josephus gets changed. I have no doubt in the The Ryrie Study Bible they told you what was in Josephus about the veil. They just change the sources somehow, I've caught them doing it now three times. Maybe even half a dozen. It's Antichrist. Like "Antichrist." Get it?

I stay mostly in Christianity. I’ve read enough of the Koran to not really believe in it. The second Surah kind of tells you to believe in the Covenant given to Israel by God, which was through Jacob and Isaac, and not Ishmael. So, it kind of refutes itself. And Hinduism is kind of cartoonish. It doesn’t have flesh. And Shintoism kind of raises good and bad at equal levels.

So, I’m concretely Christian. But, what I’ve read of Christianity, are the Old and New Testaments, many hymnals, many commentaries on the Bible, many church histories told through the martyrs, the Old and New Apocrypha, I’ve looked at historical evidence corroborating the scripture, many systematic theologies, I’ve looked at a lot of different things.

And I’ve come away with two impressions.

My study of other religions, shows them shallow, and in some regard unjust. And Christianity has none of that. And it’s a very coherent internal tautology, that shows a fulfillment of the Old Testament in the New. And it’s a comprehensive moral philosophy; its claims are backed by historical evidence, and Jesus is more of a compelling character than Vishnu, or Buddha, or Muhammad, or Confucius. I’d just say if it weren’t for the man Jesus, I’d be an Atheist. For sure. If it weren’t for Jesus, and what He did, and what He taught, and what He demonstrated, and the provenance of people dying who believed in it… I’d say I wouldn’t be a Christian if there weren’t that historical provenance to the religion, nor the founder Himself.

I see nothing compelling in Muhammad, except a warlord who wanted to galvanize his people. Hinduism is a lot like a cartoon, and it’s got bad ideas. The bad ideas in the Old Testament, are corrected in the New. And they’re prophesied to be so in Ezekiel. So, the worst of the religion—those pesky Old Testament verses that everyone gets stuck on—is fulfilled in Christ’s second Coming, when He destroys the wicked of the Earth, and rebukes the nations with a Rod of iron. We’re not to judge anymore, Israel failed to bring judgment to the world, so we’re waiting on Christ now, to bring judgment to the world. So, all those violent verses in the Old Testament, are forgiven in us through Christ, so we simply believe, and are made righteous through Him, and a desire to be holy.

Yes. I’ll give you a three pronged reason for believing.

1. Number. It’s a fact of life, everything at its base can be reduced to number. Be it a curve, or a square, or an octagon, everything has a number. Even Quanta and Gravity. And there’s four basic operations, that work together in higher and higher laws, that describe everything. Now, this isn’t enough, but if you look at what the numbers describe—see the numbers as a language—you can understand that the universe is intricately woven with a fabric of design, through seeing the way number is so fundamental and inherent in everything.

2. Good. I think Nietzsche made a pretty sound argument, that if God doesn’t exist, then neither ought good. So, I tend to take it on account, that I’ve witnessed good—and just myself, I’ve witnessed good—so I believe that if Good exists, it must be that God exists. And we wouldn’t know good, unless God demonstrated it to us, which He did at Sinai with the Table of the Ten Commandments, and then living out an example in the Flesh of His Son. As God demonstrated good to us, so we’d be in no question. Every act of Jesus, is proving the good to His argument, as everything needs to be established in first principles, and God in the flesh had to establish what was good, so we could even understand it. And I think that life, self evidently, is good. I think nobody can question that, so it proves that God is the God of the Bible.

3. The mountains of archeology proving the Bible is valid. There’s encyclopedias volumes of evidence, that you could spend a lifetime researching, and I think the Bible is the only religion that has historical provenance, it was developed collaboratively, by many witnesses, and people saw God interact with the human race. It’s the only religion like that, that has a historical component to it, that is real. And the ethics in it is flawless. Christ lived, Moses lived, it’s just too much evidence proving the Bible is sound, and God literally interacted with the human race through Moses and Jesus, and gave us laws to follow, and a consistent chain of witnesses exists throughout all of history, proving it. From martyrs in 17th century Europe to the Apostles and their protegees. And even the Jews who studied the religion before Christ.