Category: Uncategorized

“Physics Proves Math Can’t Always Work”

I'm sure it can, we just forget how to do it right. Like this got some "Kim Jung Un" vibes, of putting two water droplets together, and thinking he proved 1 + 1 = 1. It's 1 x 1. Three water droplets it's 1 x 1 x 1. And it works in base 1, like Heron's formula, which some things the number gets distorted when exponentiated. There... physics problem solved. Geez people are going backward these days.

Like no offense, but it's the same as adding a new dimension to a cube. You have one line, then another, then another. The whole cube equals 1. Adding three water droplets together, you're multiplying it, essentially. If you took the dimensions within it--and this is beyond my grasp--you could create a formula that describes the augmentation of the droplet. That's generally what happens when you get into more advanced geometry, is the number is defined by equalities.

So, physicists are probably wrong, and they made a huge and absurd leap of conjecture, based on the fact that "Nah nah nah nah boo boo, I just don't want it to be true."

Like, generally, shapes are defined by formulas, and how they interact with each other is its own geometry. You could use this same notion to solve P Versus NP, too, to look at the shapes, and work out conclusions based on geometric principles, or define new geometric principles. But, physics is generally geometry. Gravity, for instance, is quadratic--perfectly--and all physics works off of geometry. And maybe the problem is too much advanced physics is based in specious and non extant substance, that it's basically imaginary at this point. Meaning you'll have to throw most of it out, and observe things through their geometric relations. I'm not saying I can do this... but there's people who can, and that's what work in physics should be, is looking at the reality of something, and forming shapes through equations to describe the patterns they observe. If you can't, then it just doesn't exist. Maybe at a Quantum level math begins to break down... but that even has some aspect of number to it. But that's because it's basically random bursts of energy, which can only be measured through their appearance and frequency.

Poem to the Gays

“Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted.”

Thank you.

Oh it’s your world. For sure… 
Someone does love me.
And she’ll come at a time when it’s right.

It’s more your world than mine, 
And that’s alright. 

This isn’t my world. 
I have heaven to go to. 
And heaven will be all of what I want, and none of this I hate.

Eleanor

I don't know if you're just sweet and innocent
Or a catfish.
I don't know if you're a good person or not.
But, you go on your merry way...
Maybe everything I dreamed of
Maybe every nightmare come true.
A text conversation, though,
I just don't know you that well.
I know not to bite bait on a hook
Even if there looks like a hook...
Sorry friend.
Don't take it personally.

“Can Math Prove God?” A Response to Gavin Ortlund

 {}It's not "Eternal Truths" but the intricacy of it. Just like with ethics, it gets watered down to "Because God says so" this gets watered down to "Because they're objective." It's what they describe, not the fact that they do. Just like the New Testament is objective, we work from its teachings to real world ethics, and how the world actually ought to function.

Like honestly, what you're doing is a teleological fallacy. You're working from the effect to the cause. Work from the cause to the effect, that's much sounder, as it works through Modus Ponen. That's kind of the problem with this watered down theology in modern times, is everything works from "God", like Paul says, "The creation cries out there's a creator" not "The creator cries out there's a creation." We all know there's a creation. And just saying, "Aha! God said, therefore it must be," Even Nehemiah gave the sense of the Law. God doesn't want people who don't fully understand why He set these laws to pass. He wants fully cognizant faith, and understanding. He wants Wisdom.

The Jester Stole His Thorny Crown

Christian, you triumphed, and went to war.
Over hills of bodies, you climbed them,
With their lumps under your shoes.
The walls were thick, and clay and corn,
And you fought, waving your flag
And going on Crusade.
You sodomized a Dog, so said the rebellious prophet,
And you stole the Jester's Thorny Crown,
So said another prophet...
For your war, you did your duck walk
In full clown makeup and rubber nose.
You were made the fourth in the trinity,
So said that same prophet.
1=4 it would be said, so said that same prophet.
And lo and behold, Common Core Math
Makes 1=4. 

I would rather die, than slay a man in combat;
Here is the patience of the Saints;
For the world is evil, and only by good do we conquer it
And only for ourselves do we conquer it, no one else.
We conquer it within us, as we fight philistines
In our own souls; not in our brothers'.
I confessed my life of crime, and was punished dearly for it.
I, a jester too, will cast my crown to Christ.
I am not a prophet.
I sorrow over the state of the world, rather than fight it;
I cry, like Jeremiah, over the state of our world.
I am no god, or the son of a god, or godly.
I am not a prophet.
I understand equalities, and have spent time understanding them;
And I was taught the math of my Ancestors.
Why 1 cannot equal 4.

On My Writing

The hardest part, was when I was a bit younger, I had absolutely terrible prose. It’s still not the best—so people say, but I have a PA Dutch roll where I poetically inflect things, and use generative syntax.

But, just developing a style people would read.

The Love of Another, took me 10 years to finish. My first drafts were word salad, but I edited that work about 100 times. I just kept editing it, and editing it, learning.

So, I had a short story about the World War IV in my collection. And my other novel was consistently being edited as I worked. And my dad had a hand in editing it, too, but he got Then and Than completely mixed up. But, he did a pretty good job.

But I could see the difference in my short story. It was just rough. A lot of verbosity that didn’t need to be in there, a lot of function words… I edited it about 7 years after I wrote the thing. That one my uncle read, and said it was terrible. And it was… it was poorly written, but I had to come into my style.

Well, I had an English Teacher as a friend, and we argued consistently about my style. Well, to prove her wrong, I wrote a story called The Riddle in the Sea, where I used no Helper Verbs, Adverbs, Pronouns or Conjunctions. In the Dialogue I did. And… lo and behold, that act of rebellion improved my writing style immediately. It made my style more concrete.

So, I’d say finding my voice was the hardest hurdle, as I had the ideas. I was very structured—the English Teacher friend said my structure was perfect—and I had the ideas. I just needed to clean up my language.

I’d say also an 051 English Course, that just went over all the basics of syntax and punctuation, helped a lot, too. It just taught me to use commas, and semicolons, and colons, and em dashes… So I just got better progressively.

And I’d say Hail Britannica helped too. I wrote a first draft, and went over the entire thing, replacing Latin and French words with German and Old English words. Which helped crisp my language a lot. Which, that work I actually dreamt before writing it. So it is the proper Epic Poem, like John Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress.

Which, funny story about that Epic Poem, I had a vision or something, of a friend who was going to give me a Dream Machine. This shows up in my writing. And I had a conversation about the book before it was ever written. And in the vision, it was a chalice of blood that I had to drink, that I don’t remember drinking (The Cup of the LORD’s Wrath). But, in real life, I walked back through my hallway, and prayed not to receive it. And my friend disappeared. So, I still have this dream spirit attacking me—I think it was a curse—but like John Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress, it is also prophetic.

Which, the Lord says in Isaiah:

21 Therefore hear now this, thou afflicted, and drunken, but not with wine:

22 Thus saith thy Lord the Lord, and thy God that pleadeth the cause of his people, Behold, I have taken out of thine hand the cup of trembling, even the dregs of the cup of my fury; thou shalt no more drink it again:

23 But I will put it into the hand of them that afflict thee; which have said to thy soul, Bow down, that we may go over: and thou hast laid thy body as the ground, and as the street, to them that went over.

On a Modern Crusade

This would go down as one of the greatest tragedies in history, if Christians actually did this. It'd prove to the world how backward we are, and make the religion die in one flew. People like me would understand, and stand out of it... and just be like Noah or Abraham, one of only a few people in the world who know God... but this is not good lines of thinking. This is bordering on dangerous... and I just got to put my two cents in, as my goal is to see the religion flourish a long time from now. Let us be the victims, rather than the barbarians. As then we'll have the support we need. Like in Rome, we didn't fight Rome, we allowed ourselves to be victims, and that gained the ear of Constantine.

The Force and Knowledge

[W]hat corrupted [Anikin] was acting loose with the force. It’s like knowledge, you can corrupt yourself by finding perverted uses for it. Especially when you abandon what’s natural and pure for what’s artificial and coercive.

Like, knowing psychology and sociology you can use it to get what you want, or build up people. Knowing history, you can use it to undermine peace, or establish it. Knowing science you can build perverted pleasures, or use natural methods to foster cleanliness and peace—Also ties into The Lord of the Rings, is the main conflict is raw power and the waste of industry warring with peaceful authority.

That’s why I’m Christian, is Christ establishes peace, as His philosophy is pure.

Interestingly, the Northern King, the main antagonist in Daniel 11 and 12, worships a God of Forces, which may be prophesying that this king believes in the religion of Star Wars.