On the KJV, and Why It’s Still a Superior Translation

The KJV is probably the one translation I would trust, in English, to get everything right. It has no omissions, footnotes, or even circumlocutions. It has the right word, based on a deep study of the text. In every circumstance where a Modern Bible retranslates a verse, the KJV had it right, and it actually preserves the older meaning.

Not to mention, if one can reach proficiency at understanding the KJV, the world of literature opens up to that person. By reading KJV English, you can read Spencer, Shakespeare, Chaucer, Wordsworth, Coleridge, Byron, Keats, Longfellow... the entire corpus of English Literature opens up to them, and a wealth of knowledge becomes accessible.

One of the strange things about English right now, is it's destroying its own language by making word order its simplest form, which leaves people with an inability to access works of literature, in their original wordings. Which means, much of the nuance of a text is lost in translation into Modern English, whereas in the King James Version, you get a Word for Word translation in the nuances of the original language.

And where you may find a modern scholar skeptical of a word, where they'll replace it with another, the KJV is based on older manuscripts that are no longer extant. The KJV is actually more trustworthy than modern Jewish Bibles, it's more trustworthy than any other translation--short of the Geneva Bible or Tindale--and it doesn't destroy the syntax or meaning, but preserves them. 

The obvious fact is, many of our modern translations, use more current manuscripts from extant Jewish and Greek. Back when the KJV was translated, they had earlier manuscripts of both Greek and Hebrew to work with, making the translation far more faithful to the original tongue. Many political reasons have caused the Jewish People to retranslate their bible, and basically destroy the nuance, and the exceedingly clear passages of Christ, for on every occasion where Christ would shine through, Jewish Bibles, and now Christian Bibles, have obscured it from the original language, where it was clear.

The KJV is a superior translation, to any other Bible out on the market. The fact is, if one can read the KJV, they can read any literature in English. The KJV is, also, a very accurate translation, based on older and more accurate manuscripts (Ones without political designs, like the Masoretic Text or Codex Leningrad). And the KJV was the only Bible to date, in the English Tongue, written to make peace. All other Bibles were written with political or profit motives... the KJV was authorized to be apolitical, and be a chief translation, with only itself to bear. It had no political motives, it had no reason for existing, other than to unite English Speakers, and it had no profit motive, as nobody was going to make money from the book.

For this reason, I elevate the King James Version above all other Bible Translations, and would promote it as the chief Translation of the Faith in English.

The Vain Woman

How I Would Write It

I love you,
For I will walk through the desert
To bring you the scarab ring.
I will watch for you...
Only know me,
So I can have the love I want.

How She Would Write It

She loves herself.
She walks through the desert;
She will be her own camel.
She knows only she can do it
And only she can carry her.

10 Rules for Writers 2023

1. Do it for the joy. Not to please your audience. By doing this, you'll gain an audience when fortune strikes.
2. When you have a muse, write it. The minute the heavenly muse brings a theme into your mind, find time to put it to paper.
3. Don't do it for money. Certainly, as Pythagoras said, the mean man can take away what you have, but the wisdom gained, and the joyful heart, that is why we do it.
4. Be at peace. The writer needs to be at peace, as this is what writings are for, is communicating peace.
5. Be in love. The writer needs to be in love. Lucretius, in "On the Nature of Things" began his theme on Epicureanism with an exultation of Love. For it is man's greatest gift.
6. Everything is a muse. Everywhere you go, you'll take bits and pieces of knowledge, and you need to write it down. This builds the mind's capability to integrate knowledge, and transform it.
7. Write simply. Write complexly. Not platitudes. Not doublespeak. Write clear, and rich sentences, without platitude, and without unnecessary academese.
8. Build layers of meaning and nuance. Don't be afraid to enrich your audience, and have under layers of meaning, or be afraid to take things and make them meaningful.
9. Don't be crude. Don't write about suffering, and don't write without hope... hope is a powerful tool, and suffering needs to have a purpose, not be the point.
10. Kairos is not our ally. He is our enemy. The timing of the Zeitgeist and what it deems popular, is not our business... if we write well, we will be remembered.

Interesting URLS

https://www.jstor.org/stable/275162



http://dssenglishbible.com/psalms%2022.htm



https://zmin.org/hebrew-letter-meanings#%3A~%3Atext%3DThe%20origin%20of%20the%20Hebrew%2Cbeth%20did%20mean%20%E2%80%9Chouse%E2%80%9D.



https://heritagesciencejournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40494-023-00920-9



https://jbqnew.jewishbible.org/assets/Uploads/454/jbq_454_FriedmanAmenhotepzz.pdf

On Animal Intelligence and the Separation of Man from the Beast

Elephants are cool. They’re probably the second most intelligent species on the planet. Some people say Chimps, but Elephants are the only other species, that can have existential dread. They can also paint, too. It’s like a five year old’s painting, but Elephants are insanely smart.

Dogs are pretty smart, too. They can develop a sense of humor.

And there’s a bonobo who plays mine craft. But, the bonobo doesn’t build in minecraft, or use it as a cathexis; it’s more trained to do things, and then get a snack. That’s its only interest in the game, is the real world reward. An elephant might, if it could, play minecraft as a cathexis, which makes them doubly unique. Which is why you see it enjoying the zoo like a human would.

You also wouldn’t believe the number of animals that can process language, or communicate with humans. Dogs do it all the time, so do cats, parrots have been known to have verbal processing, same with some Crows and Ravens, so do Chimps, Gorillas, Bonobos. But, the Elephant is unique above all of them, because it has a capacity to understand its own mortality, and also a need for catharsis and cathexis. Like, it has an imagination, which is unique among animals, because we don’t have that recorded in any other animal. Dolphins we know have senses of humor, but they still don’t have imaginations. Not that we’ve recorded.

I don’t think any other animal, beside man, has the capacity for reason, though. The capacity to abstract something into principles of algebra or calculus. Dogs can do addition, and I’m sure some animals can do basic arithmetic, but I think there’s no animal that can do Algebra. So, I do think the ancients were right, that man is the only creature with capacity for reason. That is, as a fleshly entity. Or the capacity to take concrete principles, and reason them by abstraction to more complex concrete principles.

Which was the foundation of the Declaration of Independence, that prosperity, liberty and life were self evident virtues, and it validated the revolution, as Britain was using taxation, as a way to police communications. They were also policing the colonists, and committing heinous acts of terror. But, the Townsend and Stamp Acts were nefarious because they were paid in a foreign currency unavailable to the Colonists, and it was directed at basic necessities like glass and stationaries. But, our capacity to know such a thing is unlawful, and our capacity to reason to these principles—and transfer them down through written history—is what separates man from beast. You wouldn’t know that today, as man acts more like a beast with every passing day, and their regressions of knowledge and reason, and their incapacity to put things together and form more complex understanding.

YouTube Comment

There's actually a long standing tradition in the church--from the time of Augustine--that the "Days" in Genesis weren't literal days. And if you follow the Biblical account of Genesis 1, it does resemble, perfectly, the order Evolution would have occurred. Just saying... you don't have to stop believing in God because of evolution. That's a cop out argument, and is weak sauce. It just means you didn't want to believe in the first place.

Oh boy... Greeks used to speculate on Evolution. It's a concept as far back as 500 bc, in Pre-Ionian Philosophy.

But, I mean, the idea that the universe is self sufficient is an idea even older than that. Just about every known era of philosophy in history, dealt with it at some level. I do believe, philosophers like Aristotle and Plato had refuted the idea of the Universe's self Autonomy a long time ago. As did Aquinas and Augustine. As did Pythagoras, even before Aristotle or Plato. Pythagoras saw God in the figures of Geometry, that there was a coherent sense in the universe, that could only be sufficed by a designer. Like it will blow your mind, but Set Theory and Geometry are perfectly aligned. The same logic which defines sets, can be defined in length, width and breadth in Geometry. That's some pretty interesting stuff, there... that it can happen like that. It's never been refuted, and can't be. You can even expand that concept to Chemistry, Physics and just about everything that can be described. The sense that the same logic can be used to describe anything, shows a design to the universe. Like, the principles of Addition, Subtraction, Division and Multiplication can be used to describe all that exists, if ordered in the right manner. That's what blows my mind. The Rational. And then the empirical is the number. The rational exists through the numbers and how they relate to one another. Reason is like a predicate, and empiricism like a subject or object. I digress.

Michelle John

To the depths of my soul,
Had I known...
You'd steal my seraphim.
I pleasantly muse,
And you still rage about a childhood
Ill, that for all truth,
Happened when I was not yet a man.
I suppose your Karma works
By theft, lies, deceit, slander
And cheating and swindling?
Yes... you spin your magic web
Of lies, stealing someone's poem
I know not whose...
Hieronymus Bosch,
And trips to heaven and hell...
Tell me... did you visit Jotunheim in a dream?
Did you go to heaven, or hell?
No... but you steal even that from me.
I forgive you... though...
Which is what you ought to have done me.
I hope you enjoy your world,
Which you have fought so hard for,
And have won by your own prowess.