Arguing what might be my last debate
With an old, friend who taught me
The value of listening...

He brought me to a documentary of a king
Who sought to silence our Shadows through art---
The very worst he did was endorse smoking cigarettes.

I agreed with him, the methods employed
Could be used to the population's detriment;
I even agreed that the frustration created by
Social engineers was wrong.

I agreed with him those very psychoanalytic
Methods employed by Bernays could be used to cause great harm.
I agreed to the last breath of agreement...

But, to say that Freud's nephew was a bad man
I could not. He made prominent his uncle---
Well, literally made his theories famous,
Enriched the United States population
Along with himself in everything he did;
He enriched his uncle....
I could not agree on that point.
I could agree on everything else we talked about
But when I got to the bottom of the issue,
I would rather rich men be like Bernays
Seeking to bring everyone else up to their level
Than be like Soros and bring everyone down. 

Justice exists
To allow the most amount of happiness
For righteous people.

My love,
You said, "Poetry is an expression of self."
Yet, your words can say, "Poetry is an expression of say."
Written in my copy are your notes.

Poets are a window into man's soul---
They draw forth wisdom from men
To know their hearts and whims.
They are a looking glass---
While you have Narcissus underlined
The narcissistic task of poetry
Is used by men like me to find treasures
Of the human heart.
To know others as well as I know myself.

My poetry is to know myself and my fallibilities.
Not to reveal my heart to itself,
But to reveal the truths I have witnessed.
My whole life I have wandered the world
Searching for truth---
I have written down every truth I can find.
I am uninterested in my heart revealing itself---
I want to see, rather, the external world in my poetry.
I want to see it in the conflict,
In my characters,
Do derive the truth.

I have come close to perfecting a system for discovering truth.
It is found in the Logos---
As your words read in truth,
"Poetry is the expression of say."
That is the highest form of poetry.
For if poetry is an expression of the self,
Then it is worthless,
But if poetry expresses "Say"
Then it is truly of the noblest truths
That it finds the truth
And expresses it with perfection.

Good poetry is not internal.
It is external.
Good poetry is not selfish.
It is a purging of selfishness.
It is done for the soul purpose
Of finding, and preserving,
The truth.
So it is not forgotten.
So ethos and pathos and logos
Do not pass away,
And men can understand the past;
And thereby, form a better future.

Yes, the Bible has all revelation
But expression of the truth
In any source it comes
Is valuable.
For I use poetry to know.
Not to know myself.

He plays monopoly.
And then he says, "The poor will always be among us
"Because the poor think like the poor."
I say, "No---look at the board your rich dad taught you on.---
"The poor are poor because there are limited resources
"So rich men "Join field unto field"
"By mere chance of a dice roll
"And the other six players go bankrupt."

Mega Church pastors speculate on spiritual beings
Doing fleshly things, like texting on phones and farting
Before God's throne room.
There's a silliness to this, which betrays their vision of God.
Do I believe that Jesus may have farted with the Apostles?
Most certainly, but Jesus had a flesh body---
Erby, He passed gas. Angels, by reason of their being spiritual
Do not fart--- nor can they, otherwise they'd have a flesh body
Again.

The disorder of it, that we think of God's holy throne as a riotous
Circus, rather than a holy place, is blasphemy.
Jesus certainly had a sense of humor---
And being that He was God manifested in the Flesh,
It's very possible that Jesus farted and laughed.
I see nothing sinful in meditating on that---
But, in God's Holy Throne, where no flesh can penetrate;
Where there are spirits and sanctity,
There couldn't be such a thing.

Rather, it is the idol put in place by Bethel
Of a Jolly God, who bumbles like one of the stooges
Jolly and filled with bouncing like a cartoon.
This is not the God I worship.
The God I worship sent plagues into Egypt,
And crucified His Son.
He is very serious---
Loving, but sober.
He is not a man, nor are His angels.
The Son has resurrected flesh
Which does not subsist on fleshly foods now
But on Holy foods.
Therefore, what Bethel is teaching
Is not God, but an idol created by hands.

A dog is called a dog
It is called a perro
It is called a Hund
It is called an ur.
The Logos is what makes it a dog.

The old ancient myth of the Elephant
Where five blind men touched it
And speculated on what it was,
One blind man thought it was a snake
Because he touched its tail;
One blind man thought it was a tree,
Because he touched its leg;
One blind man thought it was a rope
Because he touched its trunk;
And one man thought it was a stone
Because he touched its trunk.
The Logos is when you stand back
And see it is an elephant which the blind man touches.

Also, there is what is just
And there is what is unjust.
The Logos is what is just.

The White Race has advanced humans
To the place we are today.
Primarily, because we occupied the most fertile lands,
The climate required us to innovate to survive,
Was warm enough at the right times to cultivate farming
And was resource rich enough, and had access enough,
To the ocean so we could build ships.
It also was the culture that adopted Chrisitanity
Which is the most advanced system of morals
Considering it is the only true system of morals.

If Blacks occupied Europe---
Which they certainly could---
They would have done all that whites did
Good and evil.
As, the Aztecs were far more advanced than Europe was
In certain regards---
But, Europe had one thing which made it advance past the Aztecs.
And that was constant wars amongst itself
And the desert kingdoms to the south.
It also had Christianity, which benevolently taught
White culture mercy.
Blacks, having all the same systems---
Would certainly have created an enlightenment
Would certainly have coupled Christian morality
With Rational Empiricism.
Certainly, Blacks would have been the ones
Who owned whites as slaves.

Humans are not different from one another---
Land, religion, oceans, forests, soil content
How much a culture must war to survive,,
These all cultivate in cultures similar ideas
And patterns, for those patterns exist to be discovered.

And because those patterns exist to be discovered
It necessitates that human beings, 
Given the philosophical background,
Will all do similar things based on those conditions.
Whereby, culture is dictated by the soil
And the culture's religion.

However, there is a certain cruelty in white civilization now
That hadn't existed in the past.
It is the same barbarism found in the Norse Gods
The same animistic tendencies----
They are divorced from Christianity
Thereby, are regressing into their natural state
Which is total barbarism.
As, given unlimited resources
And no moral authority
A culture indulges in every vice known to man.
And then it tries to say that vice is what brings about happiness.
What ultimately happens,
Until the whole world is itself unjust and wicked,
Another culture comes and sweeps the previous culture under the rug.
To which, White Civilization is regressing into barbarism as we speak
Which, much like the Norse, could only steal from other cultures
The sustenance, and had no recourse to sustaining itself.
Thus, the natural state of White Culture is piracy.
At our highest, is the Enlightenment and Christianity coupled
Into a force which built the happiest civilizations in history.
Without them, I don't believe freedom can exist.

I affirm Christianity
Because it affirms what's good about life.

I do not believe Rome converted to Christianity
Because Constantine decided it would be best
If the state were Christian.
Rather, rampant hedonism existed at that time
And men wanted an ascetic religion.
They chose Christianity
Because it affirmed there was a place for pleasure;
And that life is good, and that man and creation are not accidents.

The core of my Christianity is the liberty
I have to enjoy this Earth;
Yet, I see it is sin which steals from me that liberty.
I'm quite odd that way.
Many I talk to see the asceticism of Christianity
And find it abhorrent;
Yet, I've wrung my lips with hedonism
And chafed my throat with its burning liquor.
I lived a licentious life
And found nothing equal to the serenity I have today.

Thereby, Julian tried to turn the kingdom back to Greek Fables
But, Christ was found superior to all of it.

Though the Brandon you referred to
Is not me,
Yes, I believe that a Fetus
Has equal the value of a human life.

How, though, logically,
Does that make me pro choice?
Your reasoning doesn't make any sense.

I saw you on Ben Shapiro's Video.
I'm Brandon, you addressed me.
Whoever is out in the public,
That certainly is not me.

I'm starting to believe that Doppelganger thing is true.