Balaam

Some prophets never were saved.

Nietzsche, Yeats and Byron all wrote

Songs of what Earth would be

If no Christianity.

 

I don’t ask whether they rose

But that their spirits were wrong

That when they spoke war or peace

So they had a little yeast.

 

It would rise in bitterness;

It did rise angry at God.

Whether war or peace, they wrought

Bloodshed, for only blood’s bought

 

The foundation of reason.

Whether fairy or the gun

Men within themselves would catch

The trains to power; at last

 

They would, in all likelihood

Turn back to shaman with the

Blood of infants in their soup,

Whether or not they did coup.

 

I look at them to know aught

About my brothers gone wrong.

To have peace means right must win.

Right religion’s without sin.

 

That when Christ had brought the sword

It was good reason He did.

All other religions, sin’s

The core of their holy writ.

Christabel by Samuel Taylor Colridge, a Biographical Analysis

First thing that becomes clear, the poem is describing Lesbian themes. Furthermore, the demonic presence is captured in the “Spell” which is the unnatural romantic love between women.

Coleridge seems to have been fantasizing about a love triangle between he, his wife and his paramour.

It makes sense, that Coleridge would entertain such ideas. He loved his wife, and his paramour. Frankly, the theme of the successful love triangle has been a strange one to espouse upon, though the poem is not explicitly about this.

The poem is merely a naughty daydream, giving the moral tone significance that the relationship is not right. The “Spell” as is the case, “Spell” in the traditions of the romantic poets is likened to a wicked thing.

Why the protagonist’s name is “Christabel”, frankly, duly understood I don’t believe the poem was finished for a reason. I think Coleridge had initially entertained the gruesome thought of bedding two women who were romantically involved, and played the subconscious moral play out in this little poem.

Coleridge is almost entertaining a modern attitude about it. Which, to say, I think in this regard the correct attitude is to understand the poem as Erotic, Lesbian, but to not shy away from the cultural taboos of the day. I don’t think Coleridge would be completely aware of why he was writing it, nor what he was writing.

It seems to me that the poem was a fancy which captured Coleridge, that he would have greatly desired a romantic ménage à trois between he and the two lovers of his life. Passively, though. The poem is not conscious of diving into the material, so neither is the reader consciously aware of the true meaning of the poem. There is a mystery of the Lesbian eroticism in the poem, disparaging it nonetheless. The tone is utterly negative, taken in the context that the woman has become the desired object of both a father and daughter. It is in effect bibliomancy, and should the poem continue it would most likely end in the father and daughter’s utter destruction. Hopefully the reader cannot assume that this theme is taken lightly, and is possibly why the poem was abandoned by its author, because the subject was inappropriate. Scandalous, even for today’s day and age.

There is something unnatural in the thought of two so closely related being romantically involved with the same person, therefore, it might be a testament to the utter disparity of adultery, that such thoughts will even be allowed to be entertained. It is a testament to how wrong sin is, that if there were a boundary broken by our modern standards, this one surely will not be. Which should disturb the reader’s opinion on the legality of Homo-eroticism, whether it is Malum in Se, or Malum Prohibitum.

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. The Complete Poems. Edited by William Keach. “Christabel”, pp. 187 – 205. Penguin Classics, 2004. Text.

The Rose of Sharon

As a tender seed is she in a woman

Until her soil is made fertile.

She grows in the womb, a little sprout.

She then peaks up from the soil, a little green stem

And when she comes of the age of lovemaking

She is a beautiful, supple flower.

She becomes pollinated,

And her flower wilts, sags, droops

Until it becomes a fruit.

Her fruits drop to the earth

Each with their own seeds

To sink into the soil

With nutrient fresh fruit.

She withers and dies

And her fruit repeat the process all over again.

Wisdom

Athena, your wisdom accrued th’ou’ght the generations

And sufficient unto itself were the measurements of Pi.

You saw you broke the moral law of mankind’s herds of white sheep.

Instead of finding Grace, you found her name’s etymology.

You said to yourself, “There can be no God, for Line’s upon Line.”

You looked upon Solomon’s wisdom and said, “I may now steal.”

You looked upon Moses’ wisdom, and said, “I shall now kill.”

You spoke about David, “I may enter another man’s wife.”

Then the scripture became a license to do numerous crimes.

Grace, you figured, by her etymology, was made by Greeks.

So with that, you forgot wisdom. So with that, you forgot Who

Charity is. You defined her as Desire. Like Plato.

You said, “There can be nothing certain, except what is measured.”

Is not love measured? Is not kindness? Is not Joy and peace? Friend?

Yet you could not see them anymore to measure them. Could you, friend?

For words are more than etymologies. They are what they mean.

I will not take your crown, Athena. For it is suffering.

It is living with no knowledge, for wisdom annulled it all.

The Sublime Pleasure

To be in love is life’s greatest gift.

To feel, to know, to have the pleasure

Of lovemaking, to move the earth

To be enraptured by the form of your naked spouse.

 

It someday wanes away.

And cherished ought to be the friend

You have made

That you have had sex with

That you have made children with

That you have kissed, and shared in the most embarrassing moments.

 

Never do I say that love is bad.

For, it is God’s greatest gift to man

To feel in love for those four years

You have it.

Soon, the opium should turn

To peace. And friendship ought to be made

And conversations should be made.

 

Newlyweds in naked embrace feel so much.

Old couples in naked embrace say so much.

For, friendship ought to be the manner by which

A man and woman formed their bond.

 

Do not say to the little ones who are friends

Do not convince them of this

That it is imprudent to marry one you’ve been friends with for years.

Do not tell a man that he is a friend

That there can be no manner by which he may enter into your heart.

Whether he is ugly or beautiful

Or simply seen in a light…

Shed light on the promise of friendship

That it is more valuable than the opium of love.

For, friendship is true love.

Love is Useless as a Passion

Love is useless as a passion.

It turns knitted hearts astray.

Walking through the deserts

The children one bore to that woman

Stood, with their halved lives.

They said, “Mother, do you love papa?”

She, being a fool said, “No.”

It was that uttered word that caused

The children to suffer so much ill.

Love was just a chemical—

And once the salts were made

From the Lemon and Soda

There was no more love.

 

The man, having fallen out of love with her long ago

Was at work, turning the leather upon a spoke

Dipping it in his tanning juice

Heating it,—he was content to come home

And see his wife, make love to only her,

Provide for his children.

But, when he got home the fool said to him,

“I do not love you.”

At that moment a passion erupted in the man

Which revolted her, for she could feel no such passion.

 

Though, it wasn’t the broken heart of lost endorphins.

It was a happy life, and doing what man and woman had always done,

That was taken from him.

And so with his children.

 

If I ever find a woman,

I hope she understands this.

The Zealot

Religion had made some men crazy

While it made the bulk of men sane.

The same man religion made crazy

The atheist man had been made the same.

 

Some men cannot see a moral law.

They cannot see, and lay traps and fall

Into the dark spiritual abyss

Of murders, rapists and blasphemers amiss.

 

It makes it hard for me to say

That all men are like it

And would go astray.

 

Something in a man needs God.

And I don’t know if that’s the evidence for it

But it seems more likely a lot.

 

One man cries for revolution

And uses religion to tally the cries…

Another man steeps himself with faeries

And pagan peace descries,

The bloody mess of men falling upon his bunk.

 

It can make a heart hallow

To see religious men do things so uncouth.

Seventeen days of revolution

Can completely shatter the innocence of youth.

 

If I can say that I fight my wars in prose…

When a violent thought meanders

Men die in verse and poesy.

So knowing battle I might say

That war bands are not so gay…

Victuals of a man’s inner regrets

As he watches men in the street corners beget

Violence upon violence

Stone upon stone

Blood upon blood.

I need not tell the world that I am not he…

Yes… sundry is the word I use for a rebellious entity

Who crept in the dark with mass graves beneath.

He who would cauter revolution

To secretly find the prize.

Government, children, and the whole nation rise

To his absolute governing hand.

Revolution does nothing whence there are no values which to stand.

 

 

Byron and Yeats

I read them to understand them.

One I know is a goodhearted man

Who chose sin.

The other is a badhearted man

Who also chose sin.

Both were prophets…

Infused with God’s wisdom

Like Nietzsche.

How they interpreted a meaningless world…

A world of blood.

 

I read it, seeing how he could get lost in the particulars.

The other I see understands the need for freedom.

One went headlong into war.

The other sat in his house

Meditating on the fruitless endeavors of a revolution.

I read them to understand them.

So one cannot say to me, “You do not understand,

“Oh man,

“What the other side is saying.”

 

It’s not much different than the online troll

Who is telling me I’m pretentious.

Saying that my objection to Homosexuality is a sin.

Morality to him is smoking weed,

Sodomites,

Ripping apart fetuses,

Assisting people with suicide,

And a man cross dressing.

 

I see no difference between the high minded intellectual

And the lowbrow troll who doesn’t use grammar.

They say, “Prove your God exists.”

Is not their jadedness testament enough?

It’s proof enough for me.

That men like that exist is enough for me to cling to my Bible.

Men who would spoil the very existence of good.

Why is it so persuasive?

It’s a tantalizing little idea

That holds no water when faced with the mounting stack of evidence

That good and evil exist.

 

If men were without a God

I suppose there’d be no harm in men believing in good and evil.

Get to the bottom of the barrel

Men would war over their definitions.

Though, I’m satisfied that there is a God

Because something in me

Testifies to a moral absolute.

I never questioned it,

Only questioned my role in this moral play.

 

My argument is simple.

Morals prove God.

Where men went wrong is that God cut off their conscience

So they could no longer understand this.

They go about,

Killing children,

Smoking Weed,

Sodomizing.

And at some point enough men do it

With impunity

And gross amounts of bodies pile up in mass graves

Because one of them had sense enough to become a dictator.

 

If suffering weren’t proof of evil

And kindness proof of good

Then I suppose we shall all bow under the Tyrant

And none could depose him

For all would sing their merry little songs of the fool

Cackling while they starve.

The Modern Skeptic

When all philosophy fails

A man brings his cup to his lips.

He despairs Socrates,

Saying all love was for his hips.

 

He says, “All we know

“Is that beauty catches the eyes,

“Woman’s flesh upon my glans

“Is the only meaning I can find.

“And how I want to live;—

“I don’t care who has to suffer.”