Dear, Jordan Peterson

Dear,
Mr. Peterson

I come to you again, today, to tell you that morality is rational. That the psychopathic condition is irrational. Because more pleasure is derived from law, than lawlessness. More pleasure---for all people---is derived from law, than lawlessness.

Precisely, what law best creates pleasure? And there in lies which God is Preeminent. We have thousands of years worth of data, to show that a God whose moral is most like Christianity's, is a God Whose morality best suits the pleasures of men.

We see that men cannot have pleasure without morality. And the strictures of certain taboos---when accepted---take away the general pleasure of men because in history, men follow certain paths, and those paths create consistent behaviors and societies.

Men are like a Quadrilateral, where the laws of Quadratic Equations can be used to formulate any shape, so long as that shape has four sides. There is any number of shapes that can be created within that system, all of them valid and circumstantial based on the individual. That governorship comes to the Family, to so shape an individual within the constraints of the laws governed by such an object.

However, when men are forced into a system that warps them into a shape outside of what is written within them, they break. And that law is axiomatic, and founded in the thousands of civilizations we've seen throughout history. One degree off from that four lined shape, and men cease to function. For the laws are not meant for men anymore, but might as well be for some alien creature who does not have human DNA.

Yes, morality is objective, and the higher principles of human behavior are subject to a Higher Law that can be observed throughout history. That men rejecting that law, break the constancy of their natural shapes, and begin to degrade into chaos. Yet, the natural order is that some other power is put in place to restore order. And that is what is happening right now.

Why we know Jesus is God, and God exists, is that the morals best describing Human prosperity, and the morals which best govern Him, are exactly the morals described by Christ in His sermons, and also the Laws of Moses---that unclean foods create heart disease and thereby shorten lifespans, that unclean fabrics create septic rashes, and that sin is punished according to a gradient scale based on the severity of the crime, or that some men, having committed heinous crimes, need a way to get right before God and so have a cleansed conscience. That law is not sufficient without mercy, and that some men need to be punished more than others. A man who is sorry for committing murder is less abhorrent than a man who feels no shame in committing it. So forth, with the capital offenses justified by our current culture, there are an influx of behavior patterns which destroy the social fabric. Paramours, for instance, remove mates and the children who have bonded with them have one less individual who was imprinted upon them in their young psyches. Homosexuality creates a scarcity of sexual partners, which frustrates the libidos of not a few, and it creates social chaos. Transgenderism is duplicitous, and creates frustration. Bestiality, Catamy, such things create even worse social ills I'm sure. Catamy creates sex addicted children, who later grow up to be the very predators who abused them. And Bestiality, no society in my memory has ever degraded to such a low. But Incest, of course, destroys familial bonds, as it most certainly must.

There are causes and effects sin has on a culture, and the God who best defines sin, and the God who best manages it, and the God who best describes it, is the God of the Universe. Finding the laws which govern moral behaviors does not invalidate the Lawgiver. As, it's true that if God does not exist, neither ought the laws which govern morality. For, if there is a universal law, if it can be described---and it can---then there must be a God who created them. And considering we are talking about men, and not men from Gethen, there is only a certain way in which men can behave and operate. By bending men outside of their moral parameters, what existentially is created is chaos. And it's a pattern found in all of history, and it is one which must be understood. And because of that, morals are certain, and being that they are certain, they must prove God exists. Because no man who is rational can negate that truth, that morals are inherent in humankind.