Algebra would not work without geometry. Neither would Group Theory. And if you can't figure out why Double Primes would be useful in finding a pattern in primes (useful, not saying they could, because it could still be completely random, but then maybe that randomness could be used to establish a pattern for understanding randomocity, and would be a geometry we could use to understand that), then I can't explain to you why all that other stuff is true.

But if I try, think deeply about [what I'm saying]. Algebra works on the consistency of number and operation. Which has its root in geometry. We can only know algebra and operation works, because we observe it in geometry. Without geometry, there would be no algebra, or any use for it. As all things explained by algebra, relate to geometry. Everything in math, relates to a physical representation, and if it can't, it's not usable. That's why there are not negative cubed roots, but there are quartic.

And double primes are important for finding a pattern in prime numbers, because it's the only pattern we have to go by, in primes, is that there are double primes.

{}

 "Algebra can work without geometry". [but] if it could, apples could grow without seeds. It's just nonsense [to say that]. And everything else, in Group Theory, in order to solve it--which I don't know what Group Theory is--you'd need a geometric representation, to get to the abstract answer for other uses.

That's why Riemann's hypothesis is finding a pattern in Primes. Which, if the Zeros were the whole of it, we'd find all the primes. Which we cannot do, so it's quite arbitrary. Whereas, the only pattern we have, that's real, is the twin primes. I'd think anyway... It's just simple to process for me.

Riemann's hypothesis is probably working toward a constant, or equation that can give you a basic geometric design to solve other abstract solutions. Kind of like how quadratic equations get you to a bunch of uses, but ultimately it works on the basis of a square's area.

[So], when you do equations- {} balancing them, you're basically taking two shapes, and then molding them into equal shapes, until you balance the equation. That's the right way to look at it. As, you can relate two shapes together, if they're equal, and come to a true solution. That's just the principle of an equality. Or really, you're just deriving two shapes that are equal to the same number.

[T]he Quadratic Equation, {} is a simple analogy. It's basic stuff, but very complicated in the theory. And people who are solving Riemann's Hypothesis, are trying to find a system of logic, that describes Prime Numbers, that's like a quadratic equation in that it has many uses, and trying to create a shape that describes it. And by having that shape, and that system, you can then reach to higher concepts, that need the logic to be completed. Or like Pi, there's a constant that is defined by a circle's shape, and that's something we measure, and use all the time, to get the correct solution. Because it's the real number that defines a circle.

Yeah, people change. Stress and guilt press them so hard, that their entire personalities change. Also, finding good things does the same thing. It's really about making smart decisions and confronting your own demons. As the changeling is a turn of attitude, and you must fight it within yourself, not in others.

Or... you can just have a symbolic decade in 3193 where you celebrate its completion, and do a program on the history of that 1200 years. As the last year can be a sort of resting year, where you celebrate history, and see the thing as a time capsule. If this can actually get completed, that'd be extremely impressive. 1200 years would bring us back to the time of Cuchulain and Arthur. If humans could achieve this feat of patience, even pushing past the existence of entire empires--there's no saying Germany will be a thing 1200 years from now--that'd be impressive and a feat for all mankind. Especially without change to the design.

I think Tolkien's whole spiel, is creating technology that harmonizes with nature, both human and the earth. He got that from William Blake, which I know for a fact, he had to have some contact with Jerusalem. As the two have nearly identical themes. Like that is the meaning of TLOTR, and Sauron is not Hitler, but unchecked industrialization. It's more the conflict of World War I and not actually World War II, which is why he always hated allegory.

But that could also be the fact that Industrialization was seen as something like a Plague in the English Conscience, from even the time of William Blake, and that theme arose organically in Tolkien's mind. That's always possible, too, as communication works that way.

Tolkien, for instance, got the Ring of Power from The Elder Edda, and so did Wagner, and that's why the two are so similar, and sometimes Tolkien is erroneously said to have been inspired by Wagner, when he really was inspired by Seamunder.

But I say World War I because he saw no man's land, and the beginnings of modern warfare. That was the first modern war, and it destroyed so much of the pastureland and green, and it was the result of industrialization frustrating people. You can see film of people right on the cusp of World War I in old Film Reels, how they're kind of lackadaisical, and don't understand how to navigate the streets right, and kind of dreamily go about their business in shock by all the new advancements of technology. That's the ring of power, is that corruptive influence of power and greed, combined with the destruction of the Earth through industrialization. Smoke chimneys creating black smog that would choke out entire communities; strip mines; bad civil engineering geared more toward what's practical than what's beautiful. Mr. Scrooge is more Sauron than Hitler. It's just that wasteful greed and mindless destruction.

{}It's a religious allegory, stating how people have what they need already, and just need to find it within themselves. [It's] the same weird crap they do with Lewis Carroll, when the meaning is pretty straightforward. The Scarecrow needed a brain, but was the planner. The Tinman wanted a heart so he could love, and destroyed himself over it, but was actually the most tender character. And the Cowardly Lion was courageous. They thought they lacked what they actually had in great abundance already, and just needed to realize it, which the Wizard does by simply tricking them with common everyday items.

I mean, sure, there's a lot of poetry. Like the Green Glasses are just about how magic and faith make the world more beautiful, but the Wizard is also powerless against the witch and her flying monkeys. 

Know I'm a Christian, but this vein of Agnosticism is in the Emily Dickenson vein, which is kind of wonderful and beautiful. Not the vulgar thing it became, but rather a truth wrapped up in a veneer of atheism, and imbibed with Christian ethics.

I also think this is why Mark Twain hated people making metaphors with his work. He wanted depth, but not this level of depth [with regard to it being a political allegory]. Sure, some of that may be inspiring it, to a certain degree, but the surface reading is still the most sound and beautiful.

Again, I am a very faithful Christian. I just like to get my stories right.