I was once asked how much I trust my senses
Out of a score of one hundred percent;
The professor then went on to say,
But I didn't listen to it,
"One being the least, and 100 being the most."
I answered as such:

Hearing 18%
Sight 12%
Smell 20%
Taste 20%
Feel 30%

I'm not sure what this makes me.
For the record, I was not saying that because I don't trust my senses;
Yet, that little project was an insight into Marc's PTSD.

Noumenon is Kant's golden treasure.
Phenomenon is Kant's fecal trash.
If Phenomena is not perceptive of Noumenon
That is an error in judgment, or illness.
Perhaps even both.

The idol stood thirty cubits tall;
He towered for fifty years.
Then, the mountains groaned,
Tired upon their course,
They stretched at the command of the LORD.
At his knees, the idol fell,
And there lay he dead
His corpse to be used a millennia later
In Arab swords.

I can conceive of towers reaching twenty miles tall.
I can conceive of technologies that bring us to Times and Universes all.
I can conceive of travel to the outer edge of space.
I can conceive of a Universe infinite and great.
I can conceive of manmade structures, the size of Red Giant Stars
I can conceive of settlements on Jupiter, Venus, Saturn and Mars.

What I see is our species trying to hang a building from a stone,
An asteroid in  high orbit, how obliviously cold
They are to bring a thing so nigh
To our earth which could destroy cities; also how are we there to fly?
I see us trying to make Fusion from sulfur, nitrate and charcoal
I see us fearful to understand leverage, oh so how ominous the toll?

I'm afraid in our current intelligence, travelling to any distant star
Will be as impossible as it seems it is, to make a flying car.
For if we decide to use aerodynamics and fossil fuels,
To make a car fly with helicopter blades and pull
The winds up, while a Maglev we cannot seem to find
Time enough to improve our infrastructure, with a simple technology of that kind;
I'd say that we must discover antigravity
Before we could ever hope to sail the Hyperborean sea.

If I were an average mind, say about 100 level IQ
We'd possibly do the things I conceive, and have problems very few.
Yet, our species is simplistic and absurd.
I'm afraid we won't achieve our missions, but must live here upon the Earth.
So, my friends, learn to live in unity, and learn to get along.
For, this Earth and all its sorrows, shall be our only home.

Chinese flood, the seed of man floats
Upon the wooden beams and trash,
Debris swept through global currents.
Gun,---mortal god slain!---Yu's father
Rages at The Supreme God's choice
To destroy mankind. Yu, the Loong,
Appears, to quell the Great Flood's wrath.
A Global Flood myth, said to rage
For over twenty years, and the Loong
Is the one who saves mankind, in
Rage at the Supreme Deity
For causing the world to die.

Understand our enemy.
In Chinese mythology
The Dragon saves man from El.
Yet, in Chinese History
The Child saves man from Yu.

The dark parable of the Dragon and Lion
Where the Lion wages war with the Gold Dragon
To become the child; it says it is the Loong
Of Thou Shalt, that is warred with by the Lion's fang.
Yet, this myth clearly shows, it is not that Loong who
The Lion wars with, but rather the Golden, Yu.
And then, by warring with the rebel we become
Like the child, guitless, merciful, unable
To know Sin, which is another auld name of Yu.

I am a Common
Grackle with piebald feathers,
Half white, though, like a
Holstein's mane, with large
Circular plume. I am a 
Blackbird, still--- My songs,
Though dissonant, are perrare,
And also vital.

So, at the simplest, it’s basically a stipend program, that creates a base income for people to get started? I mean, any system that tries to eliminate poverty, I’m skeptical of. I get some of my favorite authors liked this idea. T. S. Eliot, G. K. Chesterton, C. S. Lewis, J. R. R. Tolkien, Ray Bradbury, to name a few. And I have to admit, maybe they understand it better than I do.

But, from what I’m reading, creating a universal pool of capital for people to borrow from incurs debts. Debts don’t exist on paper, they exist as a means of distributing goods and services. So, you’re going to have to base your money on something. It can’t be based on nothing. As, at some point you’re going to run into problems with apportionment. And I think it’s pretty well proven that people need labor in order to… well… survive. People can’t live without work or occupation. That’s been proven.

Maybe as a means to, in a sense, borrow into the economy this would work. Like, you could borrow money for College Tuition, or a Business Loan, but let’s look at the primary problem with this. There’s only so much real estate on the planet. So, property, if it’s one of the things you can invest in, will naturally rise as more people are born. And you can take all segments of the economy to explain this. And I’m not being Malthusian… I think in that one instant it is pretty noticeable that there is only so much arable land and resources. So, I don’t think you’ve eliminated the problem of Scarcity to begin with.

It’s hard to say, but an economy built on the practice of lending unpayable debt… it’s assuming a surplus that did exist when this was becoming popular. But, it likely can’t exist in the future. So, the only way to create a surplus, is to have people employed. Which, some of the jobs that people are employed to do, are not really that safe, or glorious. Like, a lumberjack is endangered by the logs, a quarier is endangered by the stones. There’s some principles in the Bible that I think—even being derived from Biblical ideas that Christ preached—are forgetting other portions of the Bible. For instance, you cannot eliminate the poor from existing. Why that is is simply a few things, one of them being human corruption. There’s sin. In a world without any sin or covetousness, sure… you could possibly almost have it. But, then there’s issues with supply and demand.

I wrote about this sort of idea—it’s different in many ways—in my novel The Fifth Angel’s Trumpet. And I think one of the things I was cognizant about when writing it, was that the real estate couldn’t hold the demand for the increases in population. I knew that from the get go, and was trying to find a way around that situation. The best solution, is simply to give people work. And allow them to do their business. How you get them those resources, I think that’s what Social Capital is trying to solve. To have debts without the burden of debt. And that’s interesting, but resources aren’t created on demand. They’re not willed into existence, or come into existence by sheer wishful thinking, as much as we’d like that to be the case. There’s real processes that go into every resource, and every product we have. And to have a borrowing process that eliminates the demand for debt—it’s going to have to come from some very philanthropic lenders. Let’s just say that. There has to be some real capital behind the loans, that allows this to take place.

So, generally, in a philanthropic world, this could work if the Social Capital were lent by billionaires, but then you’re assuming King, and if there’s a king in this sort of economy, who generously lends his wealth out to people without expecting anything in return… I just don’t know if that’s better than simply having the system we have today. Especially with human fallibility. Generally, Governments don’t produce wealth. They’re not supposed to. They protect their citizens, they build roads and common infrastructure, and they don’t make a very good profit. You’re basically asking, with this system, for people like Bill Gates and Elon Musk and George Soros to lend their money to people for no interest, just on the sheer benefactory nature of it being right? As I don’t see the government turning a profit to where this would be possible. And frankly, I don’t want to be beholden to people like that for my loans. Like, banks exist for a reason, and they make money for a reason. They make money off of their interest. It’s not ex-nihilo. It’s explained pretty well in Fredrick Bastiat’s Essays on Political Economy.

My only place where I agree with this notion, is that there should be an easier way for people to make it in this world, without having to go into substantial debt. And that’s a fact, that it shouldn’t be necessary for someone to go into debt in order to make a good life for themselves. And I think that’s where I agree with this system, is in that point. It’s unethical to force people into attaining a burden of debt just to survive. And as another Bible Verse says, “The wicked nation is the borrower of another” while “The righteous nation is a lender.”

Just say they wore masks
And I'll understand perfectly why
You don't like it.

It is what God is teaching me---
The emptying of my self for compassion's sake
And to humble myself before others
And not to make a show of knowledge.

For, Christ's command was Bittul,
To rebuke a Pharisee for straining a gnat
While he swallowed a camel by forgetting compassion.