In a flourishing capitalistic country
One sees the milk flowing in the streets;
One sees the honey dripping from the sidewalks;
One sees the pancakes on every street corner.
One sees free napkins, free utensils
Abundant waters in the deserts,
Lush forests, clean water,
Sterile hospitals.
They think to themselves,
“Why not share this wealth with the world?
“For, I go here, and there, and I have abundantly;
“Why does the rest of the world suffer?
“Why, do I, having this affluence, still suffer?”

Thus, mistaking the abundance
Like it were freely created energy;
Materialized atoms from magic,
They wish to disperse this to everyone.
And in doing so, a man's work is stolen from him.
Thus, the motivation for producing such wealth
Is abolished, and outlawed; Property, work, pleasure...
It belongs to all, even those who haven't labored for it.

Thus, mistaking this abundance---
As a child I was wasteful, and thought the abundance was 
Free, and would last to eternity...---
They believe they can materialize it for the world.
Yet, they forget that it is labor which creates it...
Thus, a man's labor supports him
And it is a man's property that gives him satisfaction.
But the communist wishes to abolish property,
Therefore, all incentive to work;
Therefore, none work as hard as they could.
It is work which produces from materials
The surplus we enjoy. And when work is outlawed
Because property is outlawed;
And a man is forbidden to work on his own home,
It happens that workers are sluggish, or work is outlawed.
Thus, stipends become more numerous,
And the supplies which the stipends purchase
Become less available.
To wit, men live in squalor.
This is more miserable than the most lavish poor
In our Capitalism. For the poor are well fed
In America. 
The only thing America must do, 
Is to not hinder the poor from finding meaningful labor. 

That which is. Language,
It is what was said. In math
It is what's measured.
In law, it is what truly
Increases peace and pleasure.

I have tried to do what's right
And I only do what's wrong.
At my best, with every bit of my heart
Given to the task, my righteousness
Is like a filthy cloth plugged
Into a menstruous woman.
I can do no good. Only God can.

How can we even know the truth?
If history is deliberately lied about
And written accounts are ignored...
And oral stories are more weighty
Giving justice to the Jamestown Massacre...

Let's look at the facts.
Pocahontas and John Smith were very good friends.
Given the rivalry between the Pilgrims and Powhatans
It's more than likely Pocahontas saved John Smith's life.
It's almost entirely fabricated that Pocahontas was kidnapped
And her dying in England---and I'm not sure she did at this point
Because the historical details never remain the same---
Is license for the Natives to slaughter 300 innocent people?
The Powhatans were cannibals
As was true for almost all Americans both Northern and Southern Natives;
And Pocahontas kept the peace between the two factions.

Given these factual details,
It's almost certain the modern story being taught is a fabrication
Of revisionist historians, and the actual truth
Has been lost if not outright and deliberately destroyed.

This is what happens when you mix politics and history.
When I studied this in 2020, I saw what seemed more truthful.
That Pocahontas saved John Smith's life by laying her head in his lap,
That the two had a sort of paternal relationship---as ten year old girls recognize kindness in a man---
That Pocahontas likely wasn't kidnapped, which likely did not lead to the Jamestown Massacre...
It may be true that Pocahontas got smallpox or fever in London
But that's not the settler's fault.
That is simply nature.
Furthermore, it's almost 100% unlikely that Pocahontas was the reason for Jamestown's Massacre.
As John Rolfe, her husband, and the Shaman Tomocomo accompanied her to England.

Dear,
Mr. President

Don't send us to war. Just last night I saw in my dreams body bags. Millions of them, like plastic trash bags designated for the United States if we went to war with Russia. Which were ordained over the United States. I also saw Mad Dog Mattis, like he were a dog, pinning me down to the ground, with his nose right onto my lips. And I cried out "I love you," yet he snarled, and spat. Then, other dogs came and hurled him away. Smaller dogs, who were very friendly.

Thank you for rescinding the mask order, President Biden. I have no evil to say of you. You have done well. I know I will be unpopular at my household for saying it, but the country has greatly improved under your stint as president.

However, don't be tempted to send us to war, preemptively. Maybe that is why Mattis hates me. He was like an angry American chocolate Labrador, which I went to pet. Now I say, do with him what you will. But, I am certain there is evil intent in him. We need not go to war. In our age, war would be devastating, and would lead to much mischief. 

Sincerely,
B. K. Neifert  

I had written down the story of a whorish woman. I deleted it. She was absolutely wicked, and I thought it best not to meditate on her ways.

It's true that a moral statement
Could not be made by a Christian
That couldn't be made by an Atheist.
That's because morality is self evident.
God exists to pardon us, when we haven't 
Fully committed ourselves
To what we already knew inherently.
And if we decide not to accept His pardon
He exists to bring upon men the recompense 
Of their own ill will.

If science said that at the base of everything
Were atoms, and those atoms were immutable
Unable to change, but were consistent, and could not be broken down
Any further. Then, the universe were truly infinite.
If there were not a single bit of choice,
And all things were created by an infinite chain of cause and effect.
If there were no beginning to the universe, and no end.
If there were no true communication; but rather,
Men were limited to only their rational minds'
And its experiences, if energy were created,
If an atom could not be broken down to smaller parts,
If force did not exist in the universe;
By that I mean, all things would be a causal chain
Of matter interacting with matter,
And matter were solid, and not comprised of any void,
If the universe were expanding into empty space
Which existed for eternity.

However, none of these assumptions are proven true.
Rather, just the opposite I'm being told.
Therefore, I can logically presume God exists.

How I rationalize it to my God
Is He's the best one of the lot of them.

What is the point of reading the stories
If I believed they weren't true?
One fool wipes out an entire generation
With one foolish string of words.
I clung to my Bible in Sunday School
While my teacher told me it was false.

Solomon said, "There is nothing new under the sun."
Moses said, "The stars are for other peoples."
Jordan Peterson said, "The Bible is riddled with contradictions."

Who among them has faith?
I do.

Jordan, I'd rather you be Richard Dawkins
Than defend the Bible on the principle of it being a fiction.
Really, as a psychological totem
Or Freudian analysis, or Jungian archetype---
All of that is fine, if it moves in the direction of saving faith.

I think you misunderstand the point of the Bible.
It's not to teach good morals,
It's to bring a man into relationship with the Living God
By the evidence of the miracles contained within its text.

You get the Corona of a great public intellectual.
Yet, I get the Laurel of saving knowledge through Jesus Christ.
You'll rot away with your fame and the prison you create for yourself.
I will be free...
As that was the point. To let yourself be destroyed
So I could be free and live and be one with God.

Repent.

Dear,
Dr. Peterson

I still believe the Bible is true. Both literally and symbolically.