Dear,
Kirby

The Beast, Antichrist and False Prophet will be a collaboration of 22 individuals. Not three. However, each of these public individuals correspond to the head of an actual demon, which has taken on flesh. In the end days, demons will take on flesh, and convince people they are "Aliens". I have seen the form the Dragon will take, as it has a sculpture in Hindu Temples. It is obvious that it will deceive the nations, pretending that aliens are in fact extraterrestrial beings, when indeed they are demonic apparitions meant to deceive.

However, the Beast will be three heads from the principality of Moab, three heads from the principality of Tyre, one head from the principality of Ziddon, two heads from Babylon, and one head from Assyria. The Dragon will be ten heads from Egypt---as the Nile is likened to a dragon. And the False Prophet will be two heads from Ephraim in alliance with Syria.

However, each of these heads will correspond to a demon, who controls them; and this demon looks like its description in revelation. The heads and crowns relate to their office. Some heads will have titles of nobility, while others will not. The Whore of Babylon relates to modern day Turkey, and Istanbul. From there, the whole entire world receives commerce. Istanbul is called "The City on Seven Hills." I had actually received this from a vision. Jordan will be the capital of this principality at the end of the age. I had seen this in a vision.

That is the entirety of my knowledge on this, and I have mythologized it in my poetry. Giving each of the figures a type---however it is just fiction. It is just to acclimate the reader to understanding the Nations in Revelation. The Philistines, Ammonites, Amorites, etc. have their role to play, too. However, I am not yet sure how they fit into it. Perhaps they are part of the ten heads of state who rule with Egypt.

However, the Mark of the Beast, the name of the Beast is "Sin", and "Sin" was a Moon Goddess of the Babylonians who the people's would worship by having sex with the virgins in the town square. Sin is the name of the beast. And his number is "666" or two thirds of a man. A man with his Spirit removed from him. To make him a beast like Nero. Often, I place Nero in the category of "Ephraim" or the "False Prophet", because Nero had converted to Judaism, which was the reason he persecuted Christians. 

That is the entire knowledge I have on this matter.

1. The Sin of Guido

Guido is in hell; for his deception sapped Palestina's walls.
Ulysses and Guido had both purged cities
So deception gained the walls. 
Ulysses Troy and Guido Palestina;
Then they slaughtered and utterly destroyed.
Ulysses used the Trojan Horse;
Guido the Papal Promise.

Yet, Dante, remember who was right in their war.
The Pope wished to unify Europe and end the bloodshed.
So with Ulysses he defended the right of the marriage vow.

Tom, the sluggish Prufrock...
Did he gain his lover through deception? 

2. A Satire on the American Sentence

American poets are slaves to stupid forms; what's wrong with Haikus?

Beatniks created it; I will kill it. I, a rebel poet, too.

My rebellion is form; I defy the generation herefore me.

For when poetry has no chains, only then can it truly be free.

3. The Feuding of the Heroes

I watched the feud of two great cities:
Prometheus stole the thunder, 
And Thalaba prophesied the war.
Prometheus blasphemes like Fucci
In the Circles of hell, being imprisoned
And bears his great grief with patience.

Thalaba, watching Prometheus steal
Jove's thunder, warned of great demise.
Thalaba prophesied blood, and the rain
Of putrid gore, and the oceans turned to blood.
Prometheus threw his lightning,
For he ruled the Earth and all within it.

The two, in great war, flit their powers
So the thunders roared with flashing lightning
And the oceans turned to blood,
While the Earth quaked violently.
The Poets in their prophetic powers
Spoke their curses one toward the other.

I, Thaddeus, watched, trembling in fear.
The war was great, the allies were gathering.
There was the Buck of Rylstone
Who knew the science of the feud, 
And the Mariner with his fleets,
Blown here and there, and everywhere.
Then, there was Prometheus and Ozymandias
Firing their bolts of lightning like the Queen of Hell.
The fleets of the Mariner, and the Stags rid
Into battle; Thalaba, thy wisdom!
Yet, Prometheus said of you
That thou brought shame;
Thou enlarged the fetters of free men!

I, the poor man in his sackloth
Witness the battles of great prophetic might.
The words of curses fire in their heated throws;
I am too frightened to read them.

4. The Only Way Science Could Logically Prove God Does Not Exist

If science said that at the base of everything
Were atoms, and those atoms were immutable
Unable to change, but were consistent, and could not be broken down
Any further. Then, the universe were truly infinite.
If there were not a single bit of choice,
And all things were created by an infinite chain of cause and effect.
If there were no beginning to the universe, and no end.
If there were no true communication; but rather,
Men were limited to only their rational minds'
And its experiences, if energy were created,
If an atom could not be broken down to smaller parts,
If force did not exist in the universe;
By that I mean, all things would be a causal chain
Of matter interacting with matter,
And matter were solid, and not comprised of any void,
If the universe were expanding into empty space
Which existed for eternity.

However, none of these assumptions are proven true.
Rather, just the opposite I'm being told.
Therefore, I can logically presume God exists.

How I rationalize it to my God
Is He's the best one of the lot of them.

5. Hitchens

It's true that a moral statement
Could not be made by a Christian
That couldn't be made by an Atheist.
That's because morality is self-evident.
God exists to pardon us, when we haven't 
Fully committed ourselves
To what we already knew inherently.
And if we decide not to accept His pardon
He exists to bring upon men the recompense 
Of their own ill will.

6. Pocahontas

How can we even know the truth?
If history is deliberately lied about
And written accounts are ignored...
And oral stories are more weighty
Giving justice to the Jamestown Massacre...

Let's look at the facts.
Pocahontas and John Smith were very good friends.
Given the rivalry between the Pilgrims and Powhatans
It's more than likely Pocahontas saved John Smith's life.
It's almost entirely fabricated that Pocahontas was kidnapped
And her dying in England---and I'm not sure she did at this point
Because the historical details never remain the same---
Is license for the Natives to slaughter 300 innocent people?
The Powhatans were cannibals
As was true for almost all Americans both Northern and Southern Natives;
And Pocahontas kept the peace between the two factions.

Given these factual details,
It's almost certain the modern story being taught is a fabrication
Of revisionist historians, and the actual truth
Has been lost if not outright and deliberately destroyed.

This is what happens when you mix politics and history.
When I studied this in 2020, I saw what seemed more truthful.
That Pocahontas saved John Smith's life by laying her head in his lap,
That the two had a sort of paternal relationship---as ten year old girls recognize kindness in a man---
That Pocahontas likely wasn't kidnapped, which likely did not lead to the Jamestown Massacre...
It may be true that Pocahontas got smallpox or fever in London
But that's not the settler's fault.
That is simply nature.
Furthermore, it's almost 100% unlikely that Pocahontas was the reason for Jamestown's Massacre.
As John Rolfe, her husband, and the Shaman Tomocomo accompanied her to England.

7. My Righteousness

I have tried to do what's right
And I only do what's wrong.
At my best, with every bit of my heart
Given to the task, my righteousness
Is like a filthy cloth plugged
Into a menstruous woman.
I can do no good. Only God can.

8. Logos; A Tanka

That which is. Language,
It is what was said. In math
It is what's measured.
In law, it is what truly
Increases peace and pleasure.

9. The Communist

The Communist

In a flourishing capitalistic country
One sees the milk flowing in the streets;
One sees the honey dripping from the sidewalks;
One sees the pancakes on every street corner.
One sees free napkins, free utensils
Abundant waters in the deserts,
Lush forests, clean water,
Sterile hospitals.
They think to themselves,
“Why not share this wealth with the world?
“For, I go here, and there, and I have abundantly;
“Why does the rest of the world suffer?
“Why, do I, having this affluence, still suffer?”

Thus, mistaking the abundance
Like it were freely created energy;
Materialized atoms from magic,
They wish to disperse this to everyone.
And in doing so, a man's work is stolen from him.
Thus, the motivation for producing such wealth
Is abolished, and outlawed; Property, work, pleasure...
It belongs to all, even those who haven't labored for it.

Thus, mistaking this abundance---
As a child I was wasteful, and thought the abundance was 
Free, and would last to eternity...---
They believe they can materialize it for the world.
Yet, they forget that it is labor which creates it...
Thus, a man's labor supports him
And it is a man's property that gives him satisfaction.
But the communist wishes to abolish property,
Therefore, all incentive to work;
Therefore, none work as hard as they could.
It is work which produces from materials
The surplus we enjoy. And when work is outlawed
Because property is outlawed;
And a man is forbidden to work on his own home,
It happens that workers are sluggish, or work is outlawed.
Thus, stipends become more numerous,
And the supplies which the stipends purchase
Become less available.
To wit, men live in squalor.
This is more miserable than the most lavish poor
In our Capitalism. For the poor are well fed
In America. 
The only thing America must do, 
Is to not hinder the poor from finding meaningful labor. 

10. It Would Be A Sin

God, to me,
Must exist.
For without Him
All would be immoral.

It would be a sin
If God would not
Judge... A Sin
If there were no
Heaven or Hell.

In short, 
It would be a sin
If God did not 
Exist.

For, who would then
Recompense suffering?

Guido is in hell; for his deception sapped Palestina's walls.
Ulysses and Guido had both purged cities
So deception gained the walls. 
Ulysses Troy and Guido Palestina;
Then they slaughtered and utterly destroyed.
Ulysses used the Trojan Horse;
Guido the Papal Promise.

Yet, Dante, remember who was right in their war.
The Pope wished to unify Europe and end the bloodshed.
So with Ulysses he defended the right of the marriage vow.

Tom, the sluggish Prufrock...
Did he gain his lover through deception? 

Dear,
Dante

Your masterpiece is one of my favorite muses. The eyes who gave the Pope advice, insidious. The rich being trodden down for their anger and sloth, magnificent.

However, you put Boniface in hell. He was hated by the world, I know. For, he tried to use Ecclesiastical authority to bind the kingdoms from war. In my estimation, the turmoil which would ensue from his beating and eventual death are likely the cause of the Dark Ages. The Hundred Years War and The Black Death.

Had Ecclesiastical authority proven to create peace, there would have been no hundred years war, and no black plague. How do I consider this? The influx of rats were initiated by superstition and uncleanliness. For in France it was not uncommon for there to be Sodomites, prior to the martyring of Boniface. That was the culture. And the unclean attitude created the corruption which denied Papal authority and thus led to a hundred years of war for none would have the Papal decrees of peace; and the uncleanliness created by superstition created an influx of rats from the hatred of cats, thus their fleas, thus the bubonic plague.

Boniface likely was trying to keep the peace, and the kingdoms, with no regard to Papal Authority, took him and beat him. And like a slave, Boniface died from his wounds from a fever. Yet the world hates him, and so do you? For what? Trying to bind Europe with peace? Trying to govern through Church authority? And yet today, it's said how much authority the church had, and that all the wrongs of the world are committed by Catholics. Yet, in my estimation, when a Pope tried to exercise that authority, the Kings conspired and put him to death. And the greatest poet to ever live puts that Pope in hell because of common hatred. 

It seems to me that Boniface is an example of how little power the Church had over the governments. They did what they wished. And when the Crusades happened, it was not the Church and its piousness, but the incursions into Spain from North Africa, thus a political motivation, not religious. As why would Boniface be martyred, and so hated? Why would Dante put him in hell? I do not conjure your ghost. Why put him in hell, Dante? For what? Trying to breed peace? Blessed are the Peacemakers. Yet, Boniface could not bind the warlust in Europe, and thus erupted into one of the bloodiest wars in history, and one of the longest. One hundred years of war, mingled with Plague. To which Joan of Arc, a true prophet, stopped the war; and she too was martyred!

Yet at least Joan has honor. What of Boniface? Placed in hell! Yet, Dante, no poet is perfect in knowledge. Nor are any poets purely reasoned based on the truth, and their modern age corrupts them. For that you are forgiven; for I too, must have some wrong in my masterpieces which are taught to me by the prejudice of my age. For that, I forgive you and say your work is the most brilliant, even better than Virgil. Yours is the greatest work of art in letters, no comparison. That and Milton's Paradise Lost.

Dear,
The Karate Kid

I know it is just a fictional story. Yet, if I had some words to share with Danielson, these would be it.

Karate is a good hobby. Mr. Myagi used it as a way to purge aggression. Meditation is good, and karate is a good tool at purging aggressive tendencies, and cooling down the shadow.

However, brawling as a form of self defense is wrong. Violence begets more violence. The only time one should fight, is in wartime. And in wartime, there must be a complete end of one of the two opponents. As only then can there be a resolution to the conflict.

Law's recourse is to prevent violence from spilling into the streets. And as for Johnny, forgive the man. He needs forgiveness. As I need forgiveness.

The only end to the conflict is to forgive. There can be no other way to resolve this, without bloodshed. And if there is bloodshed, it is no different than a turf war between two rival gangs.

Law begets order. Fighting begets a cycle which, gotten out of control, will end with either of the two sides warring for an entire generation, until one side is finished.

I know you're not real... But your story is real to me. To fight brings a cycle of violence, yet the recourse of law brings order.

Myagi trained only one student. His reason, was because he used Karate as a mentoring tool. Not as a means to make money. Not as a means to teach kids self defense. Each child requires special attention, and he was like a father to you, Danielson. With that, you cannot teach many students Karate. You must only teach one. It is the Myagi way. Which I hope the show teaches.

There needs to be forgiveness. As forgiveness is like a cool water over a hot flame. It makes the soul purged of its anguish. War is to be fought by nations, and declared by law. Which is how our great nation was founded, was through the order of law. Every bullet fired was ordained by the edict of law and self governance. It was not created by rebels, who then fought. It was created by well orchestrated men, whom by recourse of Law gave the precedence for war. And in that, we won our freedom. It was not mobs of men fighting in the street, as that kind of thing can only beget a cycle of violence which would perpetuate, and lo, it does.

I had listened to a sermon
Where it was said that the man at Bethesda had sinned.
And that was why he was a cripple.
And Jesus, asking him, "Do you want to be healed,"
Was really Jesus asking the man whether he wanted
The responsibilities associated with being healed;
As if being a paralytic it could be acceptable
That he lay on his cot all day;
Now he will be expected to work.
It was also taught out of a Bible
Where a verse was removed,
Where it details the angel stirring the water
So the men could be healed.
Hypocrite.

I will give the actual rendering.
Jesus asked, as I will often ask,
"Do you want this good thing?"
Not as a rebuke, not as an underhanded
Jab reminding him of his humble condition,
But because it is perfunctory kindness.
The man, being crippled, wanted in the water
Yet, he could not because men had to compete
To obtain their healing. In this was the Old Judaic Code
And Christ came to redeem man from that code.
Thus, Christ healed the man, and not the Angel
Who would heal a man through strife and trouble.
Finally, Jesus approached the man when he was healed
And the man told the Pharisees that it was Jesus
Who healed him. Jesus, before that, told the man to sin no more.
How many of you, being thrilled to death about something
Will speak of it? To anyone, no matter whom?
Ought this man be damned for his excitement?
Ought he be damned because he was joyful he was healed?
Yes? He told the Pharisees this thing maliciously?
Or, like so many men, in weakness, wish to tell their victories?
The man did not sin in telling the Pharisees.
Rather, we do not have God's omniscience,
Thus we cannot know God's thoughts.
Cease from this idle teaching, for it produces
A sort of doubt most insidious.
There was a man I encountered who was pushed in a wheel chair
With full ability to walk. Yet he would not.
Ought we liken the man at Bethesda a sinner
We will liken him to a man who feigns and illness,
And thereby make Christ less than a miracle worker.
If you can believe this about Christ, then you have no understanding of Who He is.
"The meek shall inherit the Earth," whomever that meek man is.
And being told, "Sin no more," every one of us are told this
After being healed of our infirmities, for what else can be said?
To sin more?

The chapter that best deals with it
Is Romans Chapter 1.
I believe, Christ while teaching His apostles
Verbatim said Paul's teachings.
I imagine Him sitting, and preaching,
And little Jude rebelling because he had not yet sinned.
Saying, "That is the opposite of what your teach!"
Yet, how later on those teachings would be the sweetest.

Homosexuality, in Romans 1,
Is addressed in plain terms.

"26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

"27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet."

There can be no equivocation that Homosexuality is a sin.
As, any rendering of the sense of this passage reveals
It can only be talking about Homosexuality.

To Christians, I'd rather you not be Christian
Than teach sin. There is more hope for you in total rebellion
Than there is being lukewarm. Because at least in rebellion
You can find the truth, and it will shut your mouth
And then you will have something wise to teach.

The modern Protestant's confession is as weak as Elon Musk's.
He never said he was a Christian. He affirmed Christ's teachings.
Even a fool can affirm Christ's teachings.
Rather, it is the forgiveness of our sins,
That is why we need Christ.
So we are enabled to follow His teachings.
That is why we need Christ.
And teaching Homosexuality is not a sin
Is counter the example set at the cross
Which is the forsaking of ALL sin
For the purpose of the heavenly kingdom.
That which kills a man is his sin
And Christ's yoke is light because it will unburden us
From our sin, so we no longer are compelled into it.

Therefore, unburden the homosexual
By saying, "Christ can cleanse you of this shame and abomination."
For, that is what they truly want.
Not an excise into committing more lethal shame.

At first, I like a Rabbi, saw her fruit depart
And I thought to myself, "The fruit has departed,"
And thus, "Abortion is a statutory offense."
Then, I read a sinner's article, where she clearly
Tried to refute what I had not known,
"The fruit can survive being expelled from the womb?"
She callously said, quoting I, the Rabbi;
This changed everything. Thus, life for life,
Wound for wound, burn for burn
Applied to the woman's fruit; not the woman.
It made more sense to me,
Thus, it is to be said,
"Call no one Rabbi beside Christ."

Abortion is a crime.
It is not a capital offense.