On the Authorship of the Gospel and Aliens

Where witnesses agree, like the Gospels, that is the truth. Dozens of people helped compile the Gospels, and they all are consistent accounts. Aliens are just hallucinations. As the Gospels say, witnesses must agree for a thing to be the truth. Also the Old Testament. It's the crux of the Scientific Method, too. Aliens are just hallucinations people have, and that whole entire spiel drives a man mad if they really think it's true. Same thing with Time Travel, it destroys the mind because it's not true. Any lie destroys a person's mind. But the truth makes you healthy.

They were actually written at the time Jesus lived, and at most a decade later. Except John's. And they're extremely consistent. As is true for any eyewitness, their accounts differ ever so slightly, but that just proves they aren't all from one source. And they're perfectly historically accurate.

Well, I'd say that Luke did not Copy Mark--there's no word for word copying--but rather Jesus actually said those things, so it gets accounted for twice. Scholars lie. They've made a fat career off of telling people bold faced lies. So, why do I believe the Gospels are early? Because in 90AD, we have a fragment from one named Papias, who was the person whom St. John dictated his gospel to. And St. John told Papias, that Mark was written by Mark, and Matthew by Matthew. And Matthew's was in Aramaic. And that fits into the corroboration of the account, because Aramaic gospels were found in India in the second Century, brought there by St. Thomas, and were also found by the Portuguese in the 1600s. And Mark's Gospel gets corroborated, because it is written out of order--so to speak, it's done by memory and isn't as rigorously documented like Luke and Matthew. Luke, like you said, accompanied Paul, and Paul knew the Gospel already, but Luke accounted his through gathering information from Paul's associates, such as James, Peter, John, and Mary, and also went to the Tabularium and found documents there to account for Jesus' life and ministry.

Well, it's things He said and did.

Let me put it this way. I can tell you the story of Jack and the Bean Stalk still, or Goldilocks and the Three Bears. There's a certain cadence to it, that will be similar no matter how you tell it.

The fact is, people had good memories back then. And Jesus' sayings would be remembered. And what He did would be remembered, too.

I read Mark, I read Luke, I read Matthew... Nothing to me strikes it as verbatim similar. It seems more like it came from a witness--maybe Peter had something to do with both, as Paul knew Peter, and therefore so did Luke--but then it would be cross-referenced by James.

Actually, Paul did know the Gospels, and the Aramaic gospels in India prove an early date, and prove Papais' account. Linking Matthew's Authorship to the Gospel. Showing they are eyewitnesses. And showing that Jesus did fulfill messianic prophecies, which Scholars say, the Gospels were written to mold Jesus into those prophecies. But, if they're witness--which they are, and scholars lie about them not being witness, because they want to protect the world from having to account for the miraculous--then Jesus is the LORD.