Tag: Fascism

Dear, Coca Cola

Dear, 
Coca Cola

I love Coke. I always will. I can't drink it right now for health issues, not political. But, I'll always be loyal to your brand; unless you change the formula! Don't do that. 

It's your freedom to say what you want. It's my freedom to disagree with you. I in no way condone homosexuality or race hustling. I say Homosexuality is a sin. And it's an abomination. But, if I boycotted everyone for a political difference,---well, that's just not right and I'd be boycotting just about everyone. 

And I do love Coke. So, there's no reason I can't enjoy your product and still retain my values as a Conservative. I haven't stopped watching the MLB either; I'm a Phillie Die Hard to the day I die. Fourth Generation Fan, whose Grandfather was a Philly Pro on the Tamaqua Bulldogs. So, I'm Philly for life.
 
This will pass. People will get tired of being so zealous, and come back to their senses. I'm afraid boycotts aren't going to do anything but make this culture war more militant. Let's all, Conservative and Liberal, just allow people to believe what they want. It doesn't have to be this way. 

Should you say to me, "You cannot publish, nor earn your bread from your writing", unfortunately this is the power of money, and the engine of Capitalism. And it needs to be broken. On that, I am against you.

Because your voice is stronger for your dollars, and mine is silenced, on that note I am against you. But I will not Boycott you. For, you have freedom and so do I. What point is it for me to infringe upon you your voice? Should you infringe upon mine, and boycott mine--- Well, then you are making yourself an enemy when I have been your most loyal fan.

Can I, and you, both sell our products, our brands, our ideologies? Without infringing upon one another, or stepping on one another's toes? Can I earn my bread, and you yours, without one of us trying to silence the other?
 
Not that boycotts are bad. Should you sell the parts of infants, and brew them into your potions, then I suppose I would have reason to boycott you. But, the only thing you do is exercise your free speech. And I exercise mine.
 
It is annoying to me to be told to "Be less white." What does that even mean? But, I've heard people call blacks "Niggers", and I had not cast them from my life. Nor have I boycotted them. 

We all possess our demons. We all have bad ideas. And, to get past this destructive time in our history, it would require it that I don't boycott you. And you don't boycott me.
 
That conservatives still drink Coke. And liberals, if they enjoy my product---and they will---enjoy it. As, there were plenty of times that movies I loved said things which were uncouth. When Star Wars made Darth Vader Jesus, or South Park portrayed God as a Purple Beast.

This is no different. Family Guy I hate. If given the power, I would censor them. The same as liberals would censor me. But, we ought to both understand that it is our freedom, to mutually hate one another's creativity.
 
Yet I do counsel you, that you have it in your power to silence me. And should you silence me---you and Google, and Facebook, and all the other businesses---that is Corporations taking control of the Government. And that is the very Definition of Fascism.

And if the Right can be guilty of it, so can the Left. And with that I leave you to consider.

The Idol Nation

Prosperity comes with purges.

We all eat. While Hitler starves the masses.

Men deny such things.

Men make rumors about such things.

No one really knows,

But I know if they did,

It’d be business as usual.

 

Christians get him into power.

Christians are the foundation of his ascent.

They get swept off their feet

As the Wiemar breaks down

And the Second Reich begins.

Our people swoon over the great dictator.

He assassinates political opponents

He assassinates innocent men,

In order to distract the viewing public from

His plans. His Amtsenthebungsverfahren.

Too long a word to be seriously upheld in court.

Too many syllables.

 

The people eat their food,

Drink their wine,

Are merry and wise.

All the while Hitler sends their sons overseas

To fight in wars that profit only him.

Not his sons. No, he sent your sons.

 

It is all because the nation was once great,

The Prussian Empire, with Viceroys and Viscounts

Hochadels and Uradels.

But, the people are now poor,

But Hitler made them rich

And they did not suffer a bit during the whole of the war

Until bloody hands cried out to them.

A Letter to Radicals

Dear,

Those who want to change my country…

 

Let me enter into this

discussion.

 

The Nazis mobilized

all corporate wealth

into a state engine.

 

Though everyone

WAS NOT

living off of stipends,

what’s the difference between a Nazi regime and a Communist one

in principle? Not factoids—

 

I mean in principle.

I mean, that’s the real issue we’re discussing here.

Morally, Nazis and Communists

ARE

about as repugnant as the other.

 

Just the same as if

Britain’s Monarchical class

wanted to band together

and create a new Feudalistic system[.]

[W]hat makes that system different than Nazis,

or Communists?

 

The fact remains

that they’re all repugnant

because they deny civil liberties,

and they censor speech,

and they force people into poverty,

 

and/or,

 

they commit atrocious acts.

 

I’m just being civil about this.

Every government in the world

is different.

 

America is different than Europe,

which is different than Canada,

which is different than Britain,

which is different than Australia.

 

But, we can say that the governments I just mentioned are

a tip above

Russia,

China

or North Korea.

 

And to say that Germany or Europe is socialist,

they still operate on Mixed Economies.

Nobody is subsisting off of stipends,

and if they are,

I imagine they are getting poverty stricken as a result—

which, evidence of the riots happening in places like Spain,

that’s probably what’s happening.

 

So, again, the real test of a civilization is

A: Are the people given equal opportunity to be fed and sheltered by hard—and satisfying, freely chosen—labor?

B: Can the people improve upon their social conditions fairly, and not have to be corrupt?

And

C: Are they free and uncensored to have bad or good ideas, religions, speech, etc, without physical or material persecution from their government or citizen bodies?

 

If the answer to any of those is “No”

then you’re dealing with an oppressive regime.

Which, we can

split hairs

all day about whether Socialism is bad[—]

it seems to be because it’s bringing Europe back into fetters;

it’s completely destroyed the regional cultures of most of Southern Europe.

 

Northern Europe has protected

themselves

by distancing itself from the socialism

of the EU.

That’s just what’s happening.

The thriving countries in Europe

are the hard working ones that retained their

Christianity.

The others are faltering,

 

and severely at that.

A Comment on YouTube

Let me enter into this

discussion.

 

The Nazis mobilized

all corporate wealth

into a state engine.

 

Though everyone

WAS NOT

living off of stipends,

what’s the difference between a Nazi regime and a Communist one

in principle? Not factoids—

 

I mean in principle.

I mean, that’s the real issue we’re discussing here.

Morally, Nazis and Communists

ARE

about as repugnant as the other.

 

Just the same as if

Britain’s Monarchical class

wanted to band together

and create a new Feudalistic system[.]

[W]hat makes that system different than Nazis,

or Communists?

 

The fact remains

that they’re all repugnant

because they deny civil liberties,

and they censor speech,

and they force people into poverty,

 

and/or,

 

they commit atrocious acts.

 

I’m just being civil about this.

Every government in the world

is different.

 

America is different than Europe,

which is different than Canada,

which is different than Britain,

which is different than Australia.

 

But, we can say that the governments I just mentioned are

a tip above

Russia,

China

or North Korea.

 

And to say that Germany or Europe is socialist,

they still operate on Mixed Economies.

Nobody is subsisting off of stipends,

and if they are,

I imagine they are getting poverty stricken as a result—

which, evidence of the riots happening in places like Spain,

that’s probably what’s happening.

 

So, again, the real test of a civilization is

A: Are the people given equal opportunity to be fed and sheltered by hard—and satisfying, freely chosen—labor?

B: Can the people improve upon their social conditions fairly, and not have to be corrupt?

And

C: Are they free and uncensored to have bad or good ideas, religions, speech, etc, without physical or material persecution from their government or citizen bodies?

 

If the answer to any of those is “No”

then you’re dealing with an oppressive regime.

Which, we can

split hairs

all day about whether Socialism is bad[—]

it seems to be because it’s bringing Europe back into fetters;

it’s completely destroyed the regional cultures of most of Southern Europe.

 

Northern Europe has protected

themselves

by distancing itself from the socialism

of the EU.

That’s just what’s happening.

The thriving countries in Europe

are the hard working ones that retained their

Christianity.

The others are faltering,

 

and severely at that.