The Children’s Crusade

Proem

Childs, strong, bold?
Why do your parents
Send you ‘cross burning sands?
Childs, arrayed in war-mail,
To Turkish Fords you cross
Into the Gulf’s Streamed Waters.
Cross you must, “For God told
“Us so!” Into the strip
Promised to Jacob’s lot.

How many fictions have we believed
On faith? That our
Enemy were kind
And would acquiesce
To 10,000 children
Making petition to
The Assyrian King?
Perhaps, he queried
Each one, striking
Off the head of
Each Christian child.
They were children.
So, perhaps most
Ate pudding
And worshipped Allah
As God. Few, I
Believe, were martyred.
For children who crossed
A desert would see
Lush delicacies, and
Be swayed to the
Foe’s religion.
That is how
Reality works,
Sending 10,000
Children into the
Wilderness to fight
A man’s war.

Yet, I will save
Them in verse.

I

Lo! Children’s strength
My brother, St. Simon,
Patriot, scoundrel to
The Assyrian Kings;
For St. Jude, his brother,
Whom he in murderous
Intent wished to
Kill, yet thrice over
Was won to Christ.—
Simon saw the Ten Thousand march
From Rome.
Simon, St. of the
Child, warrior of Christ
Bemused the folly.
10,000 marched to
Eternal damnation.

So! Simon with
10,000 of the Nethanim
Came to their aid.
He, in horse drawn
Chariot met the Army of the Damned.

“Children, you march
To die! I am
St. Nicholas, Patron
Of the children.
Separate from yourselves
The Girls and be
Kind to come with me!”

The children, small
Ignoble, threw off
Their cloths of war
And Iron rings.
Thus, they marched to Byzantine,
Where the purple
Threads hung like
Irish maiden’s locks
Of strands. The maids
Fell ‘pon the city
Of Constantinople,
Yet, clandestine,
For Nebuchadnezzar
Reigned there.

St. Simon knew, within
The belly of the beast,
Like Jude his brother
The bard who tells this tale…
The Childflesh would be safe. Becalmed,
He set each with
A Nethanim, and his
Wo. There, the
Journey to Prestor
John’s Kingdom would
Commence.

II

So! The troop set
Off at night,
As the green banners
Of the turks hung
With silver crescent
And the morning star.

The troop fled into
The night, carousing
The sands of Turkish
Beige, a long troop.

Through land, sea
Desert, they trekked.
Upon entering Africa
The Phœnix arose.
Simon saw the Hawk,
Knowing Lancelot
Hailed nearby.
Why, when Lancelot
Knew Magik was
Forbidden, did he
Keep a bird like
So? Some say he
Placed his soul into
The Bird, so his mindflesh
Might have eternal life.

Yet, Simon’s Brother
Arthur, loved his foe
Lancelot. So, the
Troop made meeting.

Lancelot, a moor himself
Paid tribute to the
Kings of Tyre and Ziddon,
And the kings of Egypt,
And the Giant, Spynx.
He, beloved by Arthur,
Took the troop to
The edge of the
Swamp of Despond,
Where Christian
First began his mighty
Journey.

III

In the slough,
The souls of the
Damned lay silent
With white face.
Forgotten, their pale
Pallor glew with the
Water; the Cærbenog
Be afoot, turning
The see Cobalt.
With the light
Of the fairy LORD’s
Mœgic. There, the Childflesh
Saw, reflected, in the pools
Their fantasies.
Simon, swiftly, broke
The waters, causing
The images to be
Disturbed.
From one particular
Image, arose
The Geist of
One of the damned,
Who, for eternity,
Must create the
Images of the
Fairy LORd’s trap.

Simon drew Ajax
His blade of Damascus
Forged in the heat
Of Sodom’s Brimstone
Which Abram kept
Not, but burned in
The Sulphur pits,
With 1,000 precise
Blows; Ajax was struck.
Simon, hoary locks, drawn
To his back, with
Peachflesh shorn upon his
Browhead, struck, pondering
The mystery of love.

The Geist struck high,
Twain arms to prey
Down upon Simon’s
Ajax. The blow struck.
Jude, his brother, whispered
In his ear the words
To win; “Say ‘no’!”
For, to acquiesce to
A warrior like so,
Which the more is
Fought; fraught will
Be the mind.

The Geist struck,
Yet, was a Geist
So with the blade.
Passed through
Simon, the blade
Naught but wind.

IV

Lo! Through the swamp
We left the childs.
Now, there entered
The rabbit hole.
The place where
Sense made none.
Abound, messages
Flew ‘pon the wings
Of candy wrappers
The childflesh
Leapt for them
But, Simon saw quick
The dangers.

Through the air
Flew the candies,
As gnomes hopped
For them; always
They hopped,
Yet, none could
Reach; the childs
Tried, tried, tried.
Who so tried, when
Caught, unwrapped
The candies.
Try, try, try,
If hard enough,
Each filled their mouths.
Chew, they chewed.
Lo! Look how they chewed.
Whatever candy the one
Child had, all others
Must have. So! They
Ate, filled, terrified Simon.
For, his little ones
Bargained with him:
‘twas he, and his Nethanim
Who could reach the
Candies! Lo! Simon
Had enough; so, said
“No.”

It stopped the childs
From jumping. So, soon,
They asked for roast beef.

V

There came to a
Land, of Myrr and Pirates,
Indians and fairies;
Simon saw these
Childs loved to play
Here. Simon, being boundt
For a time to leave
Then here, was taken
To a solitary place
To pray.

The Well-behaved Children
Of Simon, they
Fell into the lot
Of Indians; whose
Well organized
Society bred them
To farm and recycle
The Land.

The wicked Children,
These fell into
The pirates.
They swung, shot
Cannons over coves
Broke and smashed.

So, it came that
The Indians and
Pirates never mingled.

Those who liked play
A little too much, the
Children, they took
To the sea, where
They grew gills, and
Frolicked.

The girls, who were
Themselves beautiful,
Sprouted wings and
Berated, tinkled,
And made the
Flowers grow pretty.

Yet, some souls,
Neither good nor
Bad, those
Whom noone loved,
They wandered alone,
Never able to find
One like themselves
Though many were
There to be found.

The children came
Back to Simon.
Simon saw how
All the children
Left unto their own
Began to go astray.

So, Simon took each
Child and said, “No; your
“Behavior is naughty.
The Indians build
But do not share,
The pirates
Shoot cannons
At the lost ones.
The myrrfolk
Frolic all day
And the fairies
Beautify only themselves.
Now, children, be one
Unit again, or we
Cannot enter into
Prestor John’s Kingdom.

VI

The childflesh
Entered into Prestor John’s
Kingdom, all of them
Grown to youths.
A lion walked out
To them, so with
Another lion.

The first, he told
All the youths this;
“Here is my word;
I am Prestor John.
Forsake your friend Simon’s
Law. Rebel, and I will
Take you into my kingdom.”

The second lion
Said, “No, heed my
Speech; do not listen
To him. Simon is
Your shepherd. He
Has led you this
Far. He will lead
You into my kingdom,
For I will heed
None who do not
Honor their guides
Who love them.”

So, the children
Each made a choice.
Those who chose
The first, they
Became cowardly.

Those children
Who chose the
Second, these
Were at first
Cowardly,
Yet, for the bravery
Of their bold choice,
They entered Prestor John’s
Gates.

VII

If not obvious,
Simon is to be
The shepherd of the child.
Not the idle
Mischief lurking around
The Childflesh.

Jude, he is not so
Strong, yet unrivalled in might.
For, his pen is mightier
Than Simon’s sword,
For, the sword stays
Off the beasts,
But the pen
Guides his hand in war.

Listen to this word,
For every parent is Simon.
And every piece of
Good advice is Jude.
Nare you be angry
About m book’s lack
Of violence. ‘tis
Written so a child
Could read.

For, protect them
From nonsensical religion,
From your unworthy acquaintances,
From devices
From getting all they
Want.
Teach them, so
Their peers do
Not become their
Simon.
And when youth,
Let them succumb
To your discipline
With willing hearts.

Neifert, B. K.. The Elf in Manhattan. Kindle Direct Publishing, 2019.

©2019 B. K. Neifert

Why There is a God

What if the world were flat?

 

Just bear with me here.

 

What if the world were flat?

What evidence could

You produce,

Concretely,

To say that it wasn’t?

 

You go to the age old argument about the

Greeks measuring shadows with poles, but

Given the right math,

You could easily reason it to not be the case.

If all you have are a priori arguments,

There can be just as many cohesive arguments that the world is flat

As there are that the world is a sphere.

 

You have to go to the evidence.

That’s where the grounds of science begins.

 

Well, in the realms of

Morality,

Aesthetics,

Even

Language comprehension,

The evidence

At first

Seems very natural.

 

There are ways in which

I want to be treated,

Therefore,

There is a way in which

To treat others.

There are things

That are naturally beautiful.

 

I can understand what

Someone is saying pretty clearly.

Of course, these arguments have broken down in the past thirty years.

No longer is there morality,

But there is only your subjective morality.

No longer is there beauty,

But rather beauty is subjective.

No longer is there language comprehension,

Nor the ability to accurately understand a metaphor,

But rather it cannot occur.

 

On first principles

We know none of this is true.

 

BUT—

and here’s the big but—

If men determine these things,

They [will] all get reduced to a priori arguments,

And, therefore, have nothing with which to measure

That can substantiate them.

But, in our human experience,

We know each of them to exist

—objectively.

 

Though, it breaks down when men determine the value of something.

Therefore, because we can observe these things

—you too—

It proves there’s a God.

It’s the very basic premise of Platonism.

That there is an ultimate good

Which determines everything.

There is plenty of evidence for

Beauty, morals and language.

The fact, though, is it breaks down

On an individual level.

It begins to become more clear

On a collective level

What is beautiful, moral or comprehensible

Until the social mores reason that away,

And that’s usually the cause of great calamities

Like WWI and the Holocaust.

 

Therefore, you know there are morals,

Beauty and language.

 

The fact that there is

Proves

That there is morality, beauty and language.

But, if it’s up to men to determine what those are,

We absolutely cannot.

That’s why there is a God

Because He determines what that

Morality, beauty and language means.

It’s why there is the concept of Word,

And in Christianity,

Jesus is that Word come in the flesh.

And the way we can test Jesus,

Is by looking at His moral claims.

 

Even in the Old Testament.

 

There is judgment for destructive and evil societies, sinners, etc.

There is blessings and rewards for beneficial societies and sinners, etc.

 

Therefore, the morality of the Bible is sufficient unto itself.

You might mention, “Well the Bible condones slavery.”

Consider, the slaves were all

Pedophiles, cannibals and murderers.

Then consider what to do with them.

You’d probably [just] want them killed.

But, God told the Jews to put them to work.

Much like we do in prisons—

Which is proven to make the prison population a lot less violent.

 

Therefore, if testing the moral claims of the God of the Bible,

They all test according to the reality

Of how actual human beings function.

The Morality is so cogent,

After analyzing it,

That to call the God of the Bible

Anything less than the Creator Himself,

It would be a hard leap.

 

If you study other religions,

They have similar morals,

But not quite the same morals as Christianity{}.

Each religion does not teach the same morals.

In affect,

They have similar views,

But only the God of the Bible’s actually presents itself capable of

Predicting social patterns and behaviors,

Enough to accurately predict sociological patterns,

Simply based on the moral state of [a] society.

It’s one of the reasons I’m a Christian,

Is how moral the Bible is.

 

Bad people are going to die.

Good people are going to be rewarded.

[You’d be surprised that it’s]

Really the only religion like it [that ever existed].

The Ostrich

Metaphor,—

Because we all have skeletons;

We are all innately violent,—

My Mind in a Vat

My Last Thursdayism

My Solipsism, my Nihilism

My Parasitic Ostrich

Is a force to combat.

 

Thrown into the dens of the Dragon,

Boldly come out like Daniel did.

Recognize and escape boldly;—

It proves the existence of Meta-Phore.

Recognize there is.

 

Each creature

Is a demon;

A sickness;

What would be called a Mental Woe.

Exorcise it from the soul

By seeing its hideous form

In my fables’ verse.

 

Know evil is evil,

Why it is evil,

See why it is hideous.

 

Then my Fool did her job

By crushing her own eggs.

When I Read My Journal

I have nearly an entire shelf filled

With just books I’ve written.

Myriads of journals

Hand written in my sloppy English letters.

There is something annoying about reading it

Though. It’s like all the magic is gone.

I already know what it means.

 

To be frank, I can find some subconscious notion

To dwell on.

But, there isn’t the mystery of knowing someone else.

There isn’t the desire to find out who the person is you’re reading.

It, rather, is like looking into a mirror.

Vainly, you can like how your hair is combed—

Always backward—

You can admire your jaw bone

Or your personal facial structure.

Really, it’s the same kind of vanity.

 

A more loving mystery is in writing the thing.

In putting it to words,

Immortalizing it in ink.

Then someone can read you

Do the thing you enjoy while reading others.

 

Reality is very strange, how we love our

Image… the vain among us.

Personally, I love someone else’s thoughts.

They, with some other’s

Bounce, collide, battle wits.

Tolstoy with Emerson.

Orwell with Conspiracy Theorists.

Fascists with To Kill a Mockingbird.

 

Battle they do, the Russian Wisdom

With American. The Old Wisdom

With New Fears. The modern rebel

With the ancient wisdom of Joseph.

 

But frankly, finding them is more a treasure to me

Synthesizing them; showing how modern theories

Are bald-naked compared to the masters of ancient yesterday.

How Taoism states there is.

How Christianity gives a name to what Lao Tsu claimed was unnamed.

How modern day philosophers get every presumption wrong.

How Postmodernists were intentionally blind.

 

Frankly, though, they must battle their unending wars in literature.

But, let me rather find the soldiers.

I’ll pit them against one another and predict their futures.

I’d much rather the battle be in metaphor

Than with actual sticks and stones.

 

At the very most, reading myself is not going to dig up

Ancient treasures.

It, rather, is just a way of reminding me

Where I had come.

From Anarcho-Socialism to discovering the Platonic Form of Word.

Rather, the intellectual journey we all make

If we’re responsible about our education.

 

Many keep journals.

So do I.

The Beauty of Unreal

In this— there is a hyper-realistic eye.

This is a technique developed in the 1980s,

And is now being popularized;

It is even in its Van Gogh phase.

 

However, the beauty isn’t in the eye.

It’s in the figure at the center of the eye.

It looks like one of Michelangelo’s figures

In the Sistine Chapel.

 

That body—disproportionate

In all regard unrealistic—

Is one of the most beautiful shapes

A painter has ever drawn.

For no understood reason

This form is far more beautiful—

More neutered of sexual appetite—

Therefore, with all regards,

It is far more beautiful than the eye

In the painting itself.

 

The blend of the real—

In this case, it is a perfectly realistic

Looking unreal, even more than surreal—

With this fantasy,

Is what I was waiting for.

 

With all frankness

There are more beautiful eyes

Being done.

But it is the figure in the eye…

That which is unrealistic…

Which truly captures—

And calls to mind—

The true aesthetic of art.

The Trinity

God the Father,

God the Son;

God the Holy Spirit.

 

One God.

Not three.

 

When did this become heresy?

I will tell you.

The moment Satan stole from me

And sent a false report of me to all.

 

For no reason, men hate me—

Slander me—

Malign me.

 

They have entered death’s caverns.

 

I will hold onto the Trinity.

I will be saved.

I will not worship a pantheon.

I will only worship one LORD

Now and forever. Amen.

Ashen Prospers

The following is a criticism of Fascism.

 

Great feasts dawn the banquet halls;

Pulled pork, roastlings,

Succulent beef and lamb stews;

Hummus, corn and olives

Mashed yams and potatoes.

 

Greater is the entertainment

The halls of Bach and Handel

Agnus Dei and Billie Eilish;

The most fantastic reveries

Soft skin and paramours.

A bank filled.

 

It may even be that this continues on for eternity.

Meanwhile Kings and Courtiers strip away the rights of poets

The rights of Whistle-blowers who see rampant evils.

War could send young men across the seas

To die… bombs could level cities.

Yet the sumptuous feasts keep the people happy.

It keeps the Courts in power

Whom the men and women know nothing about.

 

Men eat. Women lay down upon their backs.

Children engross themselves with violence.

The poets, though, the poets cannot sing.